Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
# 18. Tutorial: Breakout with artwork
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
This chapter builds Breakout a second time, out of loaded PNG artwork, with a drawn
brick field, five powerups, three voices of sound and a HUD in colour. It is a bigger
program than [Chapter 17 ](17-tutorial-breakout.md )'s and it uses a completely different set
of verbs: everything here is drawn or loaded, and nothing is written into the text grid.
This is what you are building:
The finished listing is
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
[`examples/breakout/sprites/breakout.bas` ](../examples/breakout/sprites/breakout.bas ).
Read Chapter 17 first if you have not. The rules it teaches — declare every name up front,
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
loop with `GOTO` , parenthesise mixed `+` and `-` , build a random-number generator — all
apply here too, and are not repeated.
One of them is worth repeating, because this chapter leans on it harder than Chapter 17
does. * * `#` is an integer, `%` is a float and `$` is a string.** That is the opposite way
round from Commodore BASIC, and it is why ball positions and velocities here are `BLX%` and
`BLVX%` while counters and flags are `BLN#` and `BLON#` . Get one wrong and the ball moves in
whole pixels, or stops.
[Chapter 3 ](03-the-language.md ) is the language reference for the rest — `MOD` , `INSTR` ,
`MID` , `LEN` — and [Chapter 4 ](04-control-flow.md ) is `BEGIN` /`BEND` , `DO ... LOOP UNTIL`
and `GOSUB` .
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```sh norun
$ ./build-akgl/basic examples/breakout/sprites/breakout.bas
```
| Key | Does |
|---|---|
| left / right | move the paddle |
| space | start a game, launch the ball, release a stuck ball |
| P | pause |
| S | sound on and off |
| Q or escape | quit |
A broken brick drops a gem about one time in seven. Catch it with the paddle; the colour
tells you which it is.
| Gem | Name | Does | For |
|---|---|---|---|
| red | EXPAND | doubles the paddle's width | 20 seconds |
| yellow | MULTI | throws two more balls off the one in play | until they are lost |
| green | SLOW | drops the ball's speed to about two thirds | 16 seconds |
| blue | STICKY | the ball sticks where it lands; space fires it | 18 seconds |
| purple | CATCH | a second bar appears higher up the field | 24 seconds |
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
## What you will do
- **[Step 1 ](#step-1-put-artwork-on-the-screen )** — load PNG artwork into sprites
- **[Step 2 ](#step-2-budget-the-eight-sprite-slots )** — decide what each of the eight
sprites is, before writing anything else
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
- **[Step 3 ](#step-3-make-room-for-what-you-draw )** — take the text layer out of the way,
so what you draw can be seen and stays seen
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
- **[Step 4 ](#step-4-make-the-brick-stamps )** — make one brick per colour and stamp the
field out of them
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
- **[Step 5 ](#step-5-draw-at-most-one-thing-per-frame )** — draw at most one thing per
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
frame, chosen by dirty flags
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
- **[Step 6 ](#step-6-erase-one-brick-not-the-whole-field )** — erase a broken brick in
place, so the field is drawn once and not rebuilt
- **[Step 7 ](#step-7-draw-lettering-with-a-stroke-font )** — draw lettering with a stroke
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
font, because text has no colour
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
- **[Step 8 ](#step-8-move-and-bounce-the-ball )** — move the ball, bounce it off the bars
without a square root, and register the bricks as collision geometry so the interpreter
finds the hits
- **[Step 9 ](#step-9-gems-and-powerups )** — drop gems and apply what catching one does
- **[Step 10 ](#step-10-three-voices-and-a-mute )** — three voices of sound and a mute that
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
costs nothing
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
- **[Step 11 ](#step-11-the-states )** — the frame loop's states: title, serve, play, lost,
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
cleared
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
- **[Step 12 ](#step-12-put-the-program-together )** — put the pieces in one file, in the
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
right order
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
---
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
## Step 1: Put artwork on the screen
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: a picture from a file, on the screen, at its own size.**
`SPRSAV` takes an image file path as well as an array of pattern bytes, and a sprite
loaded from a file **keeps the image's own size ** rather than being squeezed into 24 by
21. That is the whole of it:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic requires=akgl setup=breakout_art screenshot=breakout-artwork
I# = 0
SPRSAV "art/paddleBlu.png", 3
SPRSAV "art/paddleRed.png", 4
SPRSAV "art/ballBlue.png", 5
SPRSAV "art/element_red_polygon_glossy.png", 6
SPRSAV "art/element_green_polygon_glossy.png", 7
SPRSAV "art/element_purple_polygon_glossy.png", 8
FOR I# = 3 TO 8
SPRITE I#, 1, 2
NEXT I#
MOVSPR 3, 20, 20
MOVSPR 4, 20, 60
MOVSPR 5, 160, 30
MOVSPR 6, 30, 120
MOVSPR 7, 130, 120
MOVSPR 8, 230, 120
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
That is the whole game's cast: two bars, a ball and five gems.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Write down the sizes now**, because every collision test later in this chapter is built
out of them:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
| Artwork | Is | Shows up later as |
|---|---|---|
| `paddleBlu.png` , `paddleRed.png` | 104 by 24 | `PDW# = 104` , and the bar's height in `HITBAR` |
| `ballBlue.png` , `ballGrey.png` | 22 by 22 | `+ 21` on every edge of the ball's box |
| the five gems | 48 by 46 | the `+ 48` and `+ 46` in the catch test |
Three more things to note.
**The path is tried against the working directory first, then against the directory the
program was loaded from.** A `.bas` stored beside its own `art/` folder therefore runs from
anywhere.
**`SPRITE n, 1, 2` turns sprite `n` on in colour 2.** A sprite's colour * multiplies * the
artwork rather than replacing it, so colour 2 — white — is the one that leaves loaded
artwork looking like itself. Any other colour tints it.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Put the art where the licence lets you.** The artwork here is Kenney's
[Puzzle Pack 1 ](https://kenney.nl/assets/puzzle-pack-1 ), released under
[CC0 ](http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ), and
`examples/breakout/sprites/art/PROVENANCE.md` records which file is used for what. CC0
does not require crediting Kenney. Do it anyway.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
## Step 2: Budget the eight sprite slots
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: know what all eight sprites are before you write the program.**
There are eight sprite slots and no more. That is not a limit you will design your way
around later, so spend them on paper first. This game spends them like this:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
| Slot | Is |
|---|---|
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
| 1 | free |
| 2 | free |
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
| 3 | the paddle |
| 4 | the catcher bar (the purple gem) |
| 5, 6, 7 | up to three balls |
| 8 | the falling gem |
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Six are spent and **two are left over ** , which is more room than the program needs. Two
consequences fall straight out of the six that are spent:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
- **The bricks are drawn rather than made of artwork.** Sixty bricks will not fit in six
slots, and a sprite is the only way to get an image file onto the screen — `GSHAPE`
cannot stamp a sprite and `SPRSAV` cannot read one back out.
- **Only one gem falls at a time.** There is one slot for it, so a brick broken while a gem
is already falling drops nothing.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Deciding this first is what stops a feature costing an afternoon before it is abandoned.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 3: Make room for what you draw
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: something you drew, still on the screen on the next frame.**
Bring the tutorials back in line with the fixed interpreter
Eleven of the thirteen defects these two games found are fixed, and the
chapters that taught around them said things that are no longer true.
Chapter 17: the drawing verbs are no longer invisible, they are covered by a
text layer that `WINDOW` can now shrink; the cell size is `RGR(3)` and the grid
is `RWINDOW`, not a hand-measured constant; a character written past a short
row's end lands. Chapter 18: traps 3 and 4 -- the skipped block that broke its
caller's `RETURN`, and `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript -- become history rather
than warnings, and Step 3 no longer claims a sprite is the *only* way to put a
picture up, only the one that costs nothing.
**Neither `.bas` listing changes, and both READMEs now say why.** The character
game still writes `CW# = 16` and the artwork game still keeps six brick stamps
in six scalars. What those listings are worth is being what a program written
against those constraints looks like, with comments explaining what each one was
avoiding -- rewriting them to pretend the problems never existed would throw
that away. So Chapter 17 Step 2 shows the `RGR(3)`/`RWINDOW` form and says
plainly that the listing beside it does not use it. That is the one place in
either chapter where a quoted fragment is not verbatim from the game.
Also: the closing pointers now say which entries are struck and which stand, and
the budgets table in Chapter 18 notes that several of those budgets were tighter
when the game was written.
TODO.md section 9 item 3 is updated rather than struck: the `WINDOW` half is
fixed, the default text area owning the whole window is not, and whether that
default is right is a question rather than a defect.
Verified against the fixed interpreter: both games run 45 seconds on the SDL
frontend with no error line and the score climbing; both suites are green in
both configurations; `docs_examples` passes and `docs_screenshots --check`
re-renders all thirteen figures byte-identically; coverage is 95.0% of lines
against the 90 gate, with src/variable.c at 100%; and every other quoted
fragment still appears verbatim in the listing it came from.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 00:31:06 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Two things have to be true before a drawing is any use, and only one of them is automatic.
Bring the tutorials back in line with the fixed interpreter
Eleven of the thirteen defects these two games found are fixed, and the
chapters that taught around them said things that are no longer true.
Chapter 17: the drawing verbs are no longer invisible, they are covered by a
text layer that `WINDOW` can now shrink; the cell size is `RGR(3)` and the grid
is `RWINDOW`, not a hand-measured constant; a character written past a short
row's end lands. Chapter 18: traps 3 and 4 -- the skipped block that broke its
caller's `RETURN`, and `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript -- become history rather
than warnings, and Step 3 no longer claims a sprite is the *only* way to put a
picture up, only the one that costs nothing.
**Neither `.bas` listing changes, and both READMEs now say why.** The character
game still writes `CW# = 16` and the artwork game still keeps six brick stamps
in six scalars. What those listings are worth is being what a program written
against those constraints looks like, with comments explaining what each one was
avoiding -- rewriting them to pretend the problems never existed would throw
that away. So Chapter 17 Step 2 shows the `RGR(3)`/`RWINDOW` form and says
plainly that the listing beside it does not use it. That is the one place in
either chapter where a quoted fragment is not verbatim from the game.
Also: the closing pointers now say which entries are struck and which stand, and
the budgets table in Chapter 18 notes that several of those budgets were tighter
when the game was written.
TODO.md section 9 item 3 is updated rather than struck: the `WINDOW` half is
fixed, the default text area owning the whole window is not, and whether that
default is right is a question rather than a defect.
Verified against the fixed interpreter: both games run 45 seconds on the SDL
frontend with no error line and the score climbing; both suites are green in
both configurations; `docs_examples` passes and `docs_screenshots --check`
re-renders all thirteen figures byte-identically; coverage is 95.0% of lines
against the 90 gate, with src/variable.c at 100%; and every other quoted
fragment still appears verbatim in the listing it came from.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 00:31:06 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**A drawing persists.** `DRAW` , `BOX` , `CIRCLE` and `PAINT` render into a layer the frame
composites underneath the text and the sprites, so a picture you draw once is there on
every frame after. You do not redraw it and you do not have to keep it anywhere.
**But the text layer covers it.** It repaints every row it owns, opaque, every frame — and
by default it owns the whole window. So the first executable line of this program is:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
WINDOW 0, 35, 49, 36
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Two rows at the bottom, which is enough for the final score, and the other thirty-five
belong to the drawing verbs. `WINDOW l, t, r, b` takes character cells, and
`RWINDOW(0)` and `RWINDOW(1)` report what you ended up with.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
That is the whole of it. Draw your field once and it stays; draw your HUD once and it
stays.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**Two consequences shape the rest of this chapter, and both are things you no longer have
to do.**
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
There is no drawing deadline. The host runs a fixed number of source lines and then
presents the frame, and a drawing longer than one batch used to be a problem — it does not
matter here, because a drawing that spans two batches simply arrives over two frames and
the layer keeps both halves.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
And there is nothing to redraw. If you change one brick, erase that brick; the other
fifty-nine are still on the screen. Which is why this chapter has no routine that walks a
list of everything still standing.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
## Step 4: Make the brick stamps
**Goal: six coloured bricks, and a field stamped out of them.**
Draw one brick per row colour, capture the six of them, and then stamp them wherever a
brick belongs with `GSHAPE` . Drawing six things and stamping sixty is far cheaper than
drawing sixty.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic requires=akgl screenshot=breakout-stamps size=100x130
DIM BRC#(6)
I# = 0
R# = 0
K# = 0
T1# = 0
T2# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 5
READ BRC#(I#)
NEXT I#
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 1
FOR R# = 0 TO 5
COLOR 1, BRC#(R#)
T1# = R# * 20
T2# = T1# + 8
FOR K# = 0 TO 7
DRAW 1, 0, T1# + K# TO 67, T1# + K# : DRAW 1, 0, T2# + K# TO 67, T2# + K#
NEXT K#
NEXT R#
DATA 3, 9, 8, 6, 4, 5
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Reading that from the top: `GRAPHIC 1, 1` selects the graphics mode and clears it.
`COLOR 1, BRC#(R#)` sets **colour source 1 ** to the palette entry that row wants — a
drawing verb names a source, not a colour, and there are seven sources. `DRAW 1, x1, y1 TO
x2, y2` draws a line using source 1.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Each brick is 68 by 16 and is filled with horizontal lines. The inner loop draws **two
scan lines per pass**, `T1# + K#` and `T2# + K#` , so eight passes fill sixteen rows. That
costs about a hundred and thirty lines for the whole set instead of the two hundred and
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
seventy a line-at-a-time loop would take.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Capturing the six is six `SSHAPE` s:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 0, 68, 16 : S0$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 20, 68, 36 : S1$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 40, 68, 56 : S2$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 68, 76 : S3$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 80, 68, 96 : S4$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 100, 68, 116 : S5$ = Z$
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**`SSHAPE` has sixteen slots and nothing gives one back**, and this program spends eight of
them: six brick colours and the two erasers in Step 6. Spent once, at startup, and never
again — nothing here captures per frame, so there is no pool to run dry and no rebuild:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL DRAWPROTOS
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 1
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
with the six `DRAW` loops, Step 6's two erasers, and eight `SSHAPE` s after it. Called once,
from the setup block.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**`PAINT` would be one statement instead of sixteen, and is not usable here.** It costs
nearly four milliseconds a call; sixty of those is seven frames' worth of time.
Now the whole screen — walls, the brick field stamped out of the six, and the artwork on
top:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic requires=akgl setup=breakout_art screenshot=breakout-screen size=800x600
DIM BRC#(6)
I# = 0
R# = 0
C# = 0
K# = 0
T1# = 0
T2# = 0
Z$ = ""
FOR I# = 0 TO 5
READ BRC#(I#)
NEXT I#
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 1
FOR R# = 0 TO 5
COLOR 1, BRC#(R#)
T1# = R# * 20
T2# = T1# + 8
FOR K# = 0 TO 7
DRAW 1, 0, T1# + K# TO 67, T1# + K# : DRAW 1, 0, T2# + K# TO 67, T2# + K#
NEXT K#
NEXT R#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 0, 68, 16 : S0$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 20, 68, 36 : S1$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 40, 68, 56 : S2$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 68, 76 : S3$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 80, 68, 96 : S4$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 100, 68, 116 : S5$ = Z$
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 2
COLOR 5, 16 : COLOR 1, 4
BOX 5, 2, 62, 797, 597
BOX 1, 6, 66, 793, 593
FOR C# = 0 TO 9
Z$ = S0$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 108
Z$ = S1$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 132
Z$ = S2$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 156
Z$ = S3$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 180
Z$ = S4$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 204
Z$ = S5$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 228
NEXT C#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 800, 600
SPRSAV Z$, 2
SPRITE 2, 1, 2
MOVSPR 2, 0, 60
SPRSAV "art/paddleBlu.png", 3
SPRSAV "art/ballBlue.png", 5
SPRITE 3, 1, 2
SPRITE 5, 1, 2
MOVSPR 3, 348, 540
MOVSPR 5, 389, 517
DATA 3, 9, 8, 6, 4, 5
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Everything above the `SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 800, 600` is a drawing nobody would ever see.
Those four lines are what make it the screen.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
A brick is 68 by 16 on a 72 by 24 pitch, ten columns by six rows, with the field's top-left
corner at (42, 108). Those numbers are worth writing down once; they come back in Steps 7
and 9.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
The finished game keeps its six stamps in six separate scalars — `S0$` to `S5$` — rather
than in an array. An array works too.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 5: Draw at most one thing per frame
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: a frame loop that paces, draws one thing, and then plays the game.**
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL FRAME
GOSUB DRAWJOB
GOSUB READKEYS
IF STATE# = 0 THEN GOSUB TITLETICK
IF STATE# = 1 THEN GOSUB SERVETICK
IF STATE# = 2 THEN GOSUB PLAYTICK
IF STATE# = 3 THEN GOSUB LOSTTICK
IF STATE# = 4 THEN GOSUB CLEARTICK
IF RUNNING# = 0 THEN GOTO SHUTDOWN
GOTO FRAME
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
At most one drawing job a frame, then the game. Nothing here has a deadline any more — a
drawing that spans two batches arrives over two frames — but a queue of one still keeps the
work even, and it keeps the * decision * about what needs redrawing in one place instead of
scattered through the game.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`DRAWJOB` is a queue of one, chosen by dirty flags — stamps first, because everything else
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
draws with them, then the field, then the HUD:
```basic norun
LABEL DRAWJOB
IF DPLAY# = 0 THEN GOTO DRAWJOB3
GOSUB DRAWPLAY
DPLAY# = 0
RETURN
LABEL DRAWJOB3
IF DHUD# = 0 THEN RETURN
GOSUB DRAWHUD
DHUD# = 0
RETURN
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
The rest of the game never draws. It sets `DPLAY# = 1` or `DHUD# = 1` when something has
changed and gets on with its frame. One consequence is visible and deliberate: **the score
lags the bricks by one frame**, because the field is drawn first. At thirty frames a second
nobody can see it.
Those are `LABEL` s and `GOTO` s rather than `BEGIN` blocks. Either works; the labels keep
each arm to one `RETURN` and read the same.
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 6: Erase one brick, not the whole field
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**Goal: take a broken brick off the screen without redrawing the other fifty-nine.**
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Because a drawing stays, removing something means covering it up. There is no
filled-rectangle verb — `BOX` outlines and `PAINT` costs about four milliseconds a call —
so the cheapest way to blank a region is a stamp of something blank:
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
COLOR 1, 1
FOR K# = 0 TO 15
DRAW 1, 0, 130 + K# TO 67, 130 + K#
NEXT K#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 130, 68, 146 : BL$ = Z$
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
The same sixteen lines the brick stamps are made of, in the background colour. Erasing is
then one statement:
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
LABEL ERASEBRICK
Z$ = BL$
GSHAPE Z$, BRKX# + C# * 72, BRKY# + R# * 24
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
RETURN
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Make a second one the width of the HUD strip while you are here, for the same reason: the
strip is rewritten whenever a number in it changes, and the old digits have to go
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
somewhere before the new ones are drawn. It is the same code with a bigger rectangle:
```basic norun
FOR K# = 0 TO 59
DRAW 1, 0, 160 + K# TO 799, 160 + K#
NEXT K#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 160, 800, 220 : HBL$ = Z$
```
Both blocks belong at the end of `DRAWPROTOS` in Step 4, drawn below the six brick
prototypes and captured with them, so the eight `SSHAPE` slots are all spent in one place.
`HBL$` is stamped at the top of the HUD redraw and `BL$` by `ERASEBRICK` .
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**This is what makes the whole field a draw-once job.** Draw the walls and all sixty bricks
when a level is laid out, and after that touch only what changes. A program that had to
redraw the field to remove one brick would need a list of what is still standing, kept in
step with the array, walked in runs per row — and none of that is here, because none of it
is needed.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 7: Draw lettering with a stroke font
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: a HUD in more than one colour.**
The text grid draws in one colour and has no verb that changes it — `CHAR` accepts a
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
colour argument and ignores it. A coloured HUD therefore has to be * drawn * , which means
carrying a font.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
The font here is four units wide and seven tall, one glyph per `DATA` line: **how many
strokes, then that many pairs of points**. A point is coded `X * 10 + Y` , so 0 is the
top-left corner, 30 the top right, 6 the bottom left and 36 the bottom right.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic requires=akgl screenshot=breakout-lettering size=260x110
DIM FNC#(5)
DIM FNI#(5)
DIM FNS#(60)
I# = 0
K# = 0
N# = 0
D# = 0
GP# = 0
GX# = 0
GX2# = 0
P1# = 0
P2# = 0
X1# = 0
Y1# = 0
X2# = 0
Y2# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 4
READ N#
FNC#(I#) = N#
FNI#(I#) = GX#
GOSUB READGLYPH
NEXT I#
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 2
COLOR 1, 8
SZ# = 9
FOR I# = 0 TO 4
GOSUB DRAWGLYPH
NEXT I#
END
LABEL READGLYPH
FOR K# = 1 TO N# * 2
READ D#
FNS#(GX#) = D#
GX# = GX# + 1
NEXT K#
RETURN
LABEL DRAWGLYPH
GP# = FNI#(I#)
GX2# = 20 + I# * SZ# * 5
FOR K# = 1 TO FNC#(I#)
P1# = FNS#(GP#)
P2# = FNS#(GP# + 1)
GP# = GP# + 2
X1# = GX2# + (P1# / 10) * SZ#
Y1# = 20 + MOD(P1#, 10) * SZ#
X2# = GX2# + (P2# / 10) * SZ#
Y2# = 20 + MOD(P2#, 10) * SZ#
DRAW 1, X1#, Y1# TO X2#, Y2#
NEXT K#
RETURN
REM S
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,3, 3,33, 33,36, 6,36
REM C
DATA 3, 0,30, 0,6, 6,36
REM O
DATA 4, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36
REM R
DATA 5, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 30,33, 13,36
REM E
DATA 4, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 6,36
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`SZ#` is the scale, so the same table draws a 12-unit `BREAKOUT` on the title screen and a
4-unit `SCORE` in the HUD.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Turning a character into a glyph number is one call: `INSTR(ALPHA$, MID(TX$, TXI#, 1))`
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
over an alphabet string. * * `MID` and `INSTR` both count from zero in this dialect**, which
is the opposite of Commodore BASIC and the opposite of most other BASICs — `MID(A$, 0, 1)`
is the first character, and `INSTR` answers 0 for a match at the front and −
at all. That is what makes the glyph number an array index with no adjustment, and it is
also why `MID("0123456789", D#, 1)` turns a digit straight into its character. That is why the order of the `DATA` lines matters — they have to
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
match the order of the characters in `ALPHA$` . The finished game uses a 41-character
alphabet covering `A` to `Z` , `0` to `9` , space, colon, dash, full stop and exclamation
mark.
**Building the strokes and drawing them are separate jobs, on different frames.** Turning a
string into strokes costs about sixteen lines a character and happens when a number
changes; the draw routine merely replays the list at two lines a stroke, and it is the one
with the deadline:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL DRAWHUD
2026-08-02 13:35:14 -04:00
GRAPHIC 1, 0
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
WIDTH 1
COLOR 0, 1 : COLOR 1, 4 : COLOR 2, 8 : COLOR 3, 5
COLOR 4, 11 : COLOR 5, 16 : COLOR 6, 6
2026-08-02 13:35:14 -04:00
Z$ = HBL$
GSHAPE Z$, 0, 0
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
BOX 5, 0, 56, 799, 57
IF HN# = 1 THEN DRAW HC#(0), HX1#(0), HY1#(0) TO HX2#(0), HY2#(0)
IF HN# < 2 THEN GOTO HUDONE
FOR I# = 0 TO HN# - 1
DRAW HC#(I#), HX1#(I#), HY1#(I#) TO HX2#(I#), HY2#(I#)
NEXT I#
LABEL HUDONE
RETURN
```
2026-08-02 13:35:14 -04:00
**`GRAPHIC 1, 0` selects the graphics mode without clearing it**, and that is the whole
difference between this routine and the ones that draw the field. Clearing here would take
the field down with the old digits, so the strip is covered by Step 6's `HBL$` eraser at
`0, 0` instead — the drawing stays, so the only way to remove something is to draw over it.
`GRAPHIC 1, 1` is right in a routine that is about to redraw everything anyway.
**`HUDTEXT` builds the stroke list and `DRAWHUD` replays it**, on different frames. Call
`HUDTEXT` wherever a number in the HUD changes — level setup, a broken brick, a lost life,
a caught gem — and it sets `DHUD# = 1` , which is all it takes to get the strip drawn.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`HX1#()` to `HY2#()` are the stroke endpoints and `HC#()` is the colour source each stroke
wants, so one pass over the list draws in as many colours as it likes: labels cyan, the
score yellow, the lives green, the level red. **Seven colour sources is the ceiling ** ,
which is why the purple gem's banner is the closest purple the palette has rather than the
gem's own.
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Note the one-stroke case written out beside the loop. **A `FOR` with equal bounds does not
run its body at all in this dialect**, so `FOR I# = 0 TO HN# - 1` with one stroke in the
list draws nothing. Write the one-item case out beside the loop with a `GOTO` past the
loop, and do it wherever a list can hold exactly one thing — a one-character word, a
one-stroke glyph, a field with one brick left. [Chapter 13 ](13-differences.md ) records the
rule; `TODO.md` §6 item 19 records why it stands.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 8: Move and bounce the ball
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: bounces at sensible angles, computed without a square root.**
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
There is no `SQR` in this dialect, so never compute a magnitude. Instead, tabulate eight
landing zones across the bar, each holding **very nearly a unit vector ** , and make every
velocity one of them times the current speed:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
DATA -0.85, -0.62, -0.40, -0.18, 0.18, 0.40, 0.62, 0.85
DATA -0.53, -0.78, -0.92, -0.98, -0.98, -0.92, -0.78, -0.53
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Read those into `ZVX%()` and `ZVY%()` . A bar bounce is then: work out which zone the ball
landed in, and assign.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL HITBAR
IF BLY%(B#) + 21 < T2# THEN RETURN
IF BLY%(B#) > T2# + 23 THEN RETURN
IF BLX%(B#) + 21 < T1# THEN RETURN
IF BLX%(B#) > T1# + T3# THEN RETURN
T4# = (BLX%(B#) + 11 - T1#) * 8 / T3#
IF T4# < 0 THEN T4# = 0
IF T4# > 7 THEN T4# = 7
BLVX%(B#) = ZVX%(T4#) * SPD%
BLVY%(B#) = ZVY%(T4#) * SPD%
BLY%(B#) = T2# - 23
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
SOUND 1, 4298, 5
HIT# = 1
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
RETURN
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`T1#` is the bar's left edge, `T2#` its top and `T3#` its width, so the same routine serves
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
the paddle and the catcher bar — `BALLPADDLE` in Step 12 calls it twice with different
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
values and reads `HIT#` to find out whether the first call already caught the ball. The
four tests at the top are the overlap; each can bail out, and reaching the fifth line means
the ball is on the bar.
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Step 9 adds two more lines before that `RETURN` , for the sticky gem.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
### Which type a variable is decides the arithmetic
Two rules matter here and they matter a lot, because breaking either produces **no error at
all** — the program computes something else and carries on.
**A ball's velocity must be a float.** `BLVX%` has a `%` suffix; a `#` variable holds
`-0.85 * 6.0` as `-5` , and a ball whose velocity is quantised to whole pixels bleeds speed
away at every bounce.
**The left operand of an expression decides whether it is done in integers or floats.**
Put the float on the left:
```basic
LEVEL# = 4
SPD% = 5.6 + LEVEL# * 0.45
PRINT "INTEGER FIRST " + SPD%
SPD% = 5.6 + 0.45 * LEVEL#
PRINT "FLOAT FIRST " + SPD%
V% = 6.4
PRINT "0 - V% " + (0 - V%)
PRINT "0.0 - V% " + (0.0 - V%)
```
```output
INTEGER FIRST 5.600000
FLOAT FIRST 7.400000
0 - V% -6
0.0 - V% -6.400000
```
`LEVEL# * 0.45` is zero because `LEVEL#` is an integer, so reversing a ball is
`0.0 - BLVX%(B#)` and never `0 - BLVX%(B#)` . This is a decision of the dialect rather than
a defect — [Chapter 3 ](03-the-language.md#the-left-operand-decides-whether-the-arithmetic-is-integer-or-float )
has the two rules that keep you out of it, and
[Chapter 13 ](13-differences.md ) names it as the difference from BASIC 7.0 most likely to
turn a working listing into a quietly wrong one.
### Bricks
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
A bounce off a wall or a brick only ever flips a sign, so a ball is always travelling at
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
exactly the `SPD%` that was in force when it last left a bar. That makes changing the speed
a **ratio of two speeds ** rather than a change of magnitude, which is what the SLOW gem
needs:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL RESCALE
IF BSPD% < 0.1 THEN BSPD% = SPD%
RAT% = SPD% / BSPD%
BSPD% = SPD%
FOR B# = 0 TO 2
IF BLON#(B#) = 1 THEN BEGIN
BLVX%(B#) = BLVX%(B#) * RAT%
BLVY%(B#) = BLVY%(B#) * RAT%
BEND
NEXT B#
RETURN
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`RAT%` is a float on purpose: an integer one holds the 0.75 of a slowdown as 0 and stops
the ball dead.
Scaling by the * vertical component * instead — setting `BLVY%` to the new speed and taking
the horizontal along with it — is not a slowdown at all. A shallow ball's small vertical
gets stretched up and drags the large horizontal with it, so SLOW makes the ball faster. The
table above is why: the outermost zones keep only 0.53 of their speed in the vertical, so
scaling that up to the new speed multiplies everything by 1/0.53, and the ball ends up
nearly twice as fast as intended. Every zone inflates; only the middle two are close enough
to vertical for it not to show.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
### Bricks are collision geometry, not arithmetic
A brick is a rectangle the interpreter knows about. Register one per brick as the level is
laid out:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
LABEL FILLROW
FOR C# = 0 TO 9
BRK#(R# * 10 + C#) = 1
BRN# = BRN# + 1
SLX# = BRKX# + C# * 72
SLY# = BRKY# + R# * 24
SLI# = (R# * 10 + C#) + 1
SOLID SLI#, SLX#, SLY#, SLX# + 68, SLY# + 16
NEXT C#
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
RETURN
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
The id is the array index plus one, so what comes back out indexes `BRK#()` with no lookup.
Compute it into `SLI#` first rather than writing the expression inline — a parenthesised
first argument to a verb is worth avoiding, and it reads better anyway.
**Retire the previous level's rectangles before laying the next one out**, not after. That
is one line in `SETUPLEVEL` , and putting it in the wrong place is silent: registering all
sixty and then clearing them leaves a wall the ball passes straight through, with no error
and nothing to see.
Then arm a handler and let it do the work:
```basic norun
COLLISION 2, BRICKHIT
```
```basic norun
LABEL BRICKHIT
MB# = BUMP(2)
IF MB# = 0 THEN RETURN
B# = 0
IF (MB# AND 16) <> 0 THEN GOSUB ONEBRICK
B# = 1
IF (MB# AND 32) <> 0 THEN GOSUB ONEBRICK
B# = 2
IF (MB# AND 64) <> 0 THEN GOSUB ONEBRICK
RETURN
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**The mask is by sprite, and the balls are sprites 5, 6 and 7** — so their bits are 16, 32
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
and 64, not 1, 2 and 4. Sprite * n * sets bit 2 to the power of * n * −
sprite 2 is 2, sprite 3 is 4, sprite 4 is 8, sprite 5 is 16, and so on to sprite 8 at 128. That is the same `5 + B#` arithmetic `MOVSPR` uses for them
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
everywhere else, and getting it wrong costs nothing visible: the handler runs, tests bits
nothing sets, and returns.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
LABEL ONEBRICK
IF BLON#(B#) = 0 THEN RETURN
N# = RCOLLISION(5 + B#, 1)
IF N# < 1 THEN RETURN
N# = N# - 1
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
IF BRK#(N#) = 0 THEN RETURN
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
DP% = RCOLLISION(5 + B#, 4)
BLX%(B#) = BLX%(B#) + (RCOLLISION(5 + B#, 2) * DP%)
BLY%(B#) = BLY%(B#) + (RCOLLISION(5 + B#, 3) * DP%)
AX# = RCOLLISION(5 + B#, 7)
IF AX# = 1 THEN BLVX%(B#) = 0.0 - BLVX%(B#)
IF AX# = 2 THEN BLVY%(B#) = 0.0 - BLVY%(B#)
R# = N# / 10
C# = MOD(N#, 10)
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
BRK#(N#) = 0
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
SOLID N# + 1
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
BRN# = BRN# - 1
SCORE# = SCORE# + BRV#(R#)
SOUND 1, 17175 - R# * 2100, 4
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
BX1# = BRKX# + C# * 72
BY1# = BRKY# + R# * 24
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
GOSUB ERASEBRICK
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
GOSUB HUDTEXT
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
IF GMON# = 1 THEN RETURN
RNMAX# = 7
GOSUB NEXTRAND
IF RNVAL# = 0 THEN GOSUB SPAWNGEM
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
`BX1#` and `BY1#` are the broken brick's top-left corner in pixels, and they are set here
because this is the only routine that knows it — Step 9's `SPAWNGEM` starts the gem falling
from that spot. The last four lines are the whole of "a broken brick drops a gem about one
time in seven": one roll, and `IF GMON# = 1 THEN RETURN` first because there is one gem
sprite and a gem already falling means no roll at all.
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Fields 2, 3 and 4 push the ball exactly clear along the contact normal. Field 7 is which
axis to reverse — **the minimum translation axis ** , which is why a ball clipping the end of
a row goes sideways rather than straight back down. Working that out by hand means building
an overlap rectangle and comparing its width to its height; it is one field here.
`SOLID N# + 1` retires the rectangle in the same statement that clears the array, so the
next frame cannot hit a brick that is no longer drawn. `GOSUB ERASEBRICK` takes it off the
screen with Step 6's blank stamp.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**Both records exist on purpose.** `BRK#()` is the program's — it is what "is the level
clear" counts and what the field redraw reads. The rectangles are the interpreter's. Keeping
them in step is two statements and the ids line up, which is the whole reason the id is the
index plus one.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 9: Gems and powerups
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: one falling gem that can be any of five things.**
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
A gem is one sprite, one type number and two timers. The type picks the artwork, the
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
banner colour and what catching it does:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL SPAWNGEM
RNMAX# = 5
GOSUB NEXTRAND
GMTYP# = RNVAL# + 1
GMX% = BX1# + 10
GMY% = BY1#
IF GMTYP# = 1 THEN SPRSAV "art/element_red_polygon_glossy.png", 8
IF GMTYP# = 2 THEN SPRSAV "art/element_yellow_polygon_glossy.png", 8
IF GMTYP# = 3 THEN SPRSAV "art/element_green_polygon_glossy.png", 8
IF GMTYP# = 4 THEN SPRSAV "art/element_blue_polygon_glossy.png", 8
IF GMTYP# = 5 THEN SPRSAV "art/element_purple_polygon_glossy.png", 8
GMON# = 1
SPRITE 8, 1, 2
MOVSPR 8, GMX%, GMY%
RETURN
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Reloading slot 8 is how one sprite becomes five gems.** `SPRSAV` over a live slot replaces
its artwork, so there is no need for a slot per gem — which is just as well, because Step 2
did not leave one.
Catching one is one routine with five arms. Each sets a timer, sets the banner text, and
does whatever that gem does:
```basic norun
LABEL TAKEGEM
SOUND 2, 8579, 14, 1, 17175, 400
SCORE# = SCORE# + 50
GOSUB HUDTEXT
IF GMTYP# = 1 THEN BEGIN
PDW# = 208
PDEXP# = 600
SPRITE 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 0
BAN$ = "EXPAND"
BEND
IF GMTYP# = 2 THEN BEGIN
BAN$ = "MULTI"
GOSUB SPLITBALLS
BEND
IF GMTYP# = 3 THEN BEGIN
SLOWT# = 480
SPD% = 4.2
GOSUB RESCALE
BAN$ = "SLOW"
BEND
IF GMTYP# = 4 THEN BEGIN
STKON# = 1
STKT# = 540
BAN$ = "STICKY"
BEND
IF GMTYP# = 5 THEN BEGIN
CTON# = 1
CTTM# = 720
SPRITE 4, 1, 2
BAN$ = "CATCH"
BEND
BANT# = 90
GOSUB SETBANNER
RETURN
```
EXPAND is `SPRITE 3, 1, 2, 0, 1, 0` — the x-expand flag, which is the only scaling a sprite
has, and doubling the artwork is exactly what it wants. `PDW#` is the width the collision
test uses, so it has to be doubled with it.
MULTI throws two more balls off the one in play, at slightly different angles so they do
not travel as a stack:
```basic norun
LABEL SPLITBALLS
IF BLN# > 2 THEN RETURN
IF BLON#(0) = 0 THEN RETURN
FOR B# = 1 TO 2
IF BLON#(B#) = 0 THEN BEGIN
BLON#(B#) = 1
BLST#(B#) = 0
BLX%(B#) = BLX%(0)
BLY%(B#) = BLY%(0)
BLVX%(B#) = ZVX%(B# * 5 - 4) * SPD%
BLVY%(B#) = ZVY%(B# * 5 - 4) * SPD%
BLN# = BLN# + 1
SPRITE 5 + B#, 1, 2
BEND
NEXT B#
RETURN
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
STICKY is three lines at the end of `HITBAR` in Step 8, replacing its final `RETURN` — the
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
ball stops where it landed and remembers its offset along the bar:
```basic norun
IF STKON# = 0 THEN RETURN
BLST#(B#) = 1
BLOFF# = BLX%(B#) - PDX%
RETURN
```
and space releases it, straight up the middle:
```basic norun
LABEL UNSTICK
FOR B# = 0 TO 2
IF BLST#(B#) = 1 THEN BEGIN
BLST#(B#) = 0
BLVX%(B#) = ZVX%(4) * SPD%
BLVY%(B#) = ZVY%(4) * SPD%
BEND
NEXT B#
RETURN
```
The CATCH bar **mirrors ** the paddle rather than following it — the line is in `MOVEPADDLE`
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
in Step 12:
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
CTX% = 0.0 - PDX% + WALLL# + WALLR# - 104
```
A second bar directly above the first is worth nothing; a mirrored one turns a dive across
the field into a save at both ends. Note the leading `0.0` rather than `0` , for the reason
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
in Step 8.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
### Every timer in one place
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
A timer is a frame count decremented in one routine, so an expiry is exactly where the
effect is undone and there is only one place to look:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL TIMERS
IF BANT# > 0 THEN BEGIN
BANT# = BANT# - 1
IF BANT# = 0 THEN BEGIN
BAN$ = ""
GOSUB SETBANNER
BEND
BEND
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
IF PDEXP# > 0 THEN BEGIN
PDEXP# = PDEXP# - 1
IF PDEXP# = 0 THEN BEGIN
PDW# = 104
SPRITE 3, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0
BEND
BEND
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
IF SLOWT# > 0 THEN BEGIN
SLOWT# = SLOWT# - 1
IF SLOWT# = 0 THEN BEGIN
GOSUB LEVELSPEED
GOSUB RESCALE
BEND
BEND
IF STKT# > 0 THEN BEGIN
STKT# = STKT# - 1
IF STKT# = 0 THEN BEGIN
STKON# = 0
GOSUB UNSTICK
BEND
BEND
IF CTTM# > 0 THEN BEGIN
CTTM# = CTTM# - 1
IF CTTM# = 0 THEN BEGIN
CTON# = 0
SPRITE 4, 0
BEND
BEND
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Each arm is the same shape: count down, and on the frame it reaches zero, put back what the
gem changed. SLOW expiring calls `LEVELSPEED` rather than assigning a number, so the speed
it returns to is the speed the current level should be running at.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 10: Three voices and a mute
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: sound that does not cut itself off, and a mute that costs one line.**
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Give each kind of sound its own voice. Voice 1 is the ball hitting things, voice 2 is the
gem and the ball being lost, and voice 3 is reserved for `PLAY` — so a brick going cannot
cut a tune off mid-note.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
**`SOUND` 's frequency argument is a SID register value, not hertz.** The pitch is
`register * 1022730 / 16777216` — see [Chapter 7 ](07-sound.md#sound ) — so work the notes
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
out once and write them down: 17175 is C6, 8579 C5, 4298 C4, 3609 A3.
Pitch the brick tone by the row it came from and the wall plays itself down a scale as it
comes apart:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
SOUND 1, 17175 - R# * 2100, 4
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Mute with `VOL 0` rather than a flag tested at every call site:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL PRESSMUTE
SNDON# = 1 - SNDON#
IF SNDON# = 1 THEN VOL 8
IF SNDON# = 0 THEN VOL 0
RETURN
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
A silenced voice costs nothing to issue, so one line here beats eleven scattered through
the game.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Set up the envelope and tempo once at startup:
Stop the listings and their chapters stating fixed defects as fact
You were right that this was still everywhere. The two `.bas` files carried
their workarounds as present-tense statements about the interpreter -- "a name
first created inside a GOSUB costs a value slot that is never handed back",
"writing PAST the terminator of a short row draws nothing at all", "SSHAPE and
GSHAPE ignore the subscript on a string array", "a FOR inside a BEGIN block does
not survive the RETURN" -- and every one of those is now false. A comment that
lies is worse than no comment, and these were the first thing anybody opening
the files would read.
**The characters game takes the geometry fix.** `CW# = 16` becomes `CW# =
RGR(3)`, and the grid comes from `RWINDOW`, so the game fits whatever window and
font the host gives it. That was the one thing in the listing that would break on
a different font, and `RGR(3)` and `RWINDOW` were added to the interpreter
because of it -- leaving the constant in place while Chapter 17 teaches the
function was the inconsistency worth closing. `RGR(1)` still comes first so a
build with no graphics device refuses by naming the device that is missing.
Everything else in both listings keeps its shape and says why. Declaring every
name up front, guarding loops with `GOTO`, six scalars for six brick stamps: none
is forced any more and none costs anything, so they stay, with the comments
marking which rules stand and which are history. The sprites header's five traps
are marked FIXED where they are fixed.
The chapters follow: Chapter 17 Step 2 no longer says "the listing still has
`CW# = 16`", and Chapter 18's trap section is "five things that did not do what
they looked like" with the two that still stand named up front rather than left
to be counted.
Verified: Chapter 17 Step 2's block is once again verbatim from the listing, so
every quoted fragment in both chapters matches its source with no exceptions;
both games run 40 seconds on the SDL frontend with no error line; both suites
green in both configurations; `docs_examples` and `docs_screenshots --check`
pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 06:32:48 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
VOL 8
ENVELOPE 0, 0, 6, 0, 4
TEMPO 12
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`PLAY` takes a string of notes, which is what the fanfares are:
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
PLAY "V3 T2 U8 O4 QC QE QG O5 HC"
```
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 11: The states
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**Goal: the five states the frame loop in Step 5 dispatches to.**
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Each is a subroutine called once a frame while that state is current. This is a different
shape from Chapter 17's branch targets, and it works here because nothing jumps out of a
loop to reach it.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:26:47 -04:00
There are seven state numbers and only five tick routines. **5 is game over and 6 is
paused, and neither has one on purpose**: the frame loop's `IF STATE# = n THEN GOSUB` list
simply has no line for them, so the frame draws whatever is on the screen, reads the
keyboard and does nothing else. That is exactly what a pause is, and writing an empty
subroutine to say so would cost a label.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```basic norun
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL TITLETICK
STIMER# = STIMER# + 1
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
RETURN
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL SERVETICK
GOSUB MOVEPADDLE
BLX%(0) = PDX% + BLOFF#
BLY%(0) = PDY# - 23
MOVSPR 5, BLX%(0), BLY%(0)
RETURN
Release the scope a skipped BEGIN block's loop pushed
`akbasic_parse_for()` and `akbasic_parse_do()` create their environment while
the line is *parsed*; whether to skip it is decided afterwards, when the line is
evaluated. So a loop inside a block that was not taken pushed a scope, its body
was skipped, and the `NEXT` or `LOOP` that would have popped it was skipped too.
Nothing else ever would.
At the top level that exhausted the pool after thirty-two skips. Inside a
routine it was far more confusing: the orphan sat between the routine and its
caller, so the `RETURN` after the block reported "RETURN outside the context of
GOSUB" from a routine that plainly *was* entered by a `GOSUB` -- naming the one
construct that was not at fault, which is why it cost an evening to find.
The skip now releases what parsing pushed.
**Narrower than it first looks.** Releasing on any skip breaks
tests/reference/language/flowcontrol/nestedforloopwaitingforcommand.bas: a
zero-iteration `FOR` skips its body by the same mechanism, and there the orphan
is load-bearing -- it absorbs the inner `NEXT` so the outer `NEXT` still finds
its own `FOR`. Releasing it turns that case into "NEXT outside the context of
FOR". So the release is conditional on the skip being a *block* skip, which is
decidable because nothing inside a skipped block ever runs to arm a `NEXT` wait.
Both halves are asserted side by side in tests/structure_verbs.c, the second one
citing the golden case that caught it.
The forty-skip case names its own step budget: a skipped line is not free, and
forty passes over a five-line block cost about 2700 steps against the shared
runner's 2000.
Chapter 18's trap 3 becomes history rather than a warning, and the note in Step
5 that called `GOTO`-guarded loops "not a style choice" now says why the shape
is kept anyway.
TODO.md section 9 item 2, struck.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 23:55:10 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL PLAYTICK
GOSUB MOVEPADDLE
GOSUB MOVEBALLS
GOSUB MOVEGEM
GOSUB TIMERS
IF BRN# = 0 THEN GOSUB LEVELDONE
IF BLN# = 0 AND STATE# = 2 THEN GOSUB BALLGONE
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL LOSTTICK
STIMER# = STIMER# - 1
IF STIMER# > 0 THEN RETURN
IF LIVES# > 0 THEN GOSUB SERVEAGAIN
IF LIVES# < 1 THEN GOSUB GAMEISOVER
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
RETURN
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL CLEARTICK
STIMER# = STIMER# - 1
IF STIMER# > 0 THEN RETURN
LEVEL# = LEVEL# + 1
GOSUB SETUPLEVEL
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`STIMER#` is a frame countdown, which is how "hold this message up for a second and a half"
is written without stopping the game.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Laying a level out is one routine. Every third level is a row shorter, so the field changes
shape as well as pace:
Honour a subscript in SSHAPE and GSHAPE
`shape_variable()` took the identifier off the leaf and looked the variable up
without ever evaluating the subscript, and both verbs then addressed element
zero with a literal. So `SSHAPE SH$(2), ...` wrote the handle into `SH$(0)` and
`GSHAPE SH$(2)` stamped whatever was in `SH$(0)`.
Ordinary assignment and `PRINT` honour the subscript, which is what made this
expensive: a program keeping several saved shapes in an array got every one of
them resolving to the same element, silently, and the only symptom was that
every stamp came out as the last shape captured. The Breakout in examples/ keeps
its six brick stamps in six separate scalars for exactly this reason.
`SPRSAV` was the counter-example and is the model -- it evaluates its argument
and handles an array element correctly. The subscript resolution itself is now
shared: `collect_subscripts()` comes out of src/environment.c as
`akbasic_environment_collect_subscripts()`, so a verb taking a variable by name
resolves a subscript the same way assignment does rather than each verb deciding
for itself.
tests/graphics_verbs.c covers TODO.md's reduction -- which used to print
"[SHAPE:0] []" and now prints "[] [SHAPE:0]" -- and the case a program actually
wants: two shapes captured into two elements, each stamped back through its own,
asserted against the device log so a fix that merely made the strings look right
would not pass.
Chapter 18's trap 4 becomes history, and Chapter 6 says an array works.
TODO.md section 9 item 6, struck.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 00:10:24 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL SETUPLEVEL
GOSUB CLEARPOWERS
GOSUB LEVELSPEED
T3# = 6
IF MOD(LEVEL#, 3) = 2 THEN T3# = 5
IF MOD(LEVEL#, 3) = 0 THEN T3# = 4
BRN# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 59
BRK#(I#) = 0
NEXT I#
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
SOLID
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
FOR R# = 0 TO 5
IF R# < T3# THEN GOSUB FILLROW
NEXT R#
GOSUB RESETBALL
GOSUB HUDTEXT
STATE# = 1
DPLAY# = 1
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL LEVELSPEED
SPD% = 5.6 + 0.45 * LEVEL#
IF SPD% > 11.0 THEN SPD% = 11.0
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`CLEARPOWERS` turns off every powerup, every timer and the two sprites they use, and is
called from level setup, from a re-serve and from the title screen — so no state can leak
from one game into the next.
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
## Step 12: Put the program together
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**Goal: one file, in an order that runs.**
The file runs from the top, so three things about the order matter and nothing else does:
setup first, `DATA` in the order it will be read, and every `LABEL` present somewhere.
```text
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
WINDOW 0, 35, 49, 36 the text layer, out of the way -- Step 3
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
the declaration block, below
GOSUB LOADTABLES the row colours, values and bounce zones
GOSUB LOADFONT the stroke font
SEED# = MOD(1 + TI# * 7919, 2147483648)
the artwork from Step 1
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
VOL 8 / ENVELOPE / TEMPO from Step 10
COLLISION 2, BRICKHIT the brick handler -- Step 8
GOSUB DRAWPROTOS the stamps, once -- Steps 4 and 6
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
GOSUB TITLESCREEN
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
LABEL FRAME the frame loop from Step 5
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
the draw jobs, the input, the states, the ball, the gems,
the text builders, the generator
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
--- in any order ---
the tables as DATA read by LOADTABLES
the font as DATA read by LOADFONT
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**`LOADTABLES` must run before `LOADFONT` , because the tables' `DATA` is written first.**
One `READ` cursor walks every `DATA` item in the file in the order they appear, no matter
which routine is reading, so whichever loader runs first gets whichever `DATA` comes first.
Get that backwards and the font table fills with brick colours, which does not fail — it
just draws nonsense.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
### The declaration block
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
STATE# = 0
RUNNING# = 1
SCORE# = 0
LIVES# = 3
LEVEL# = 1
HISCORE# = 0
STIMER# = 0
LASTT# = 0
KEYV# = 0
SNDON# = 1
WALLL# = 12
WALLR# = 788
BRKX# = 42
BRKY# = 108
PDX% = 348
PDY# = 540
PDW# = 104
PDDIR# = 0
PDCO# = 0
PDEXP# = 0
CTON# = 0
CTX% = 348
CTTM# = 0
DIM BLON#(3)
DIM BLX%(3)
DIM BLY%(3)
DIM BLVX%(3)
DIM BLVY%(3)
DIM BLST#(3)
BLN# = 0
BLOFF# = 41
SPD% = 6.0
BSPD% = 6.0
RAT% = 1.0
SLOWT# = 0
STKON# = 0
STKT# = 0
GMON# = 0
GMTYP# = 0
GMX% = 0
GMY% = 0
DIM BRK#(60)
DIM BRC#(6)
DIM BRV#(6)
BRN# = 0
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
S0$ = "" : S1$ = "" : S2$ = ""
S3$ = "" : S4$ = "" : S5$ = ""
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
BL$ = "" : HBL$ = ""
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Z$ = ""
DHUD# = 1
DPLAY# = 1
BAN$ = ""
BANT# = 0
ALPHA$ = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789 :-.!"
DIM FNS#(280)
DIM FNI#(41)
DIM FNC#(41)
DIM HX1#(120)
DIM HY1#(120)
DIM HX2#(120)
DIM HY2#(120)
DIM HC#(120)
HN# = 0
DIM PX1#(110)
DIM PY1#(110)
DIM PX2#(110)
DIM PY2#(110)
DIM PC#(110)
PN# = 0
BUILDH# = 0
TX$ = "" : TXX# = 0 : TXY# = 0
TXS# = 3 : TXC# = 1 : TLEN# = 0 : TXI# = 0
GC# = 0 : GN# = 0 : GP# = 0 : GX# = 0 : GK# = 0
P1# = 0 : P2# = 0
NUM$ = ""
DIM ZVX%(8)
DIM ZVY%(8)
I# = 0 : K# = 0 : N# = 0 : R# = 0 : C# = 0 : D# = 0 : B# = 0
T1# = 0 : T2# = 0 : T3# = 0 : T4# = 0
BX1# = 0 : BY1# = 0
LFT# = 0 : TOP# = 0 : RGT# = 0 : BOT# = 0
CC1# = 0 : CC2# = 0 : RR1# = 0 : RR2# = 0
HIT# = 0
SEED# = 1 : RNMAX# = 2 : RNVAL# = 0
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
MB# = 0 : AX# = 0 : DP% = 0.0
SLX# = 0 : SLY# = 0 : SLI# = 0
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
**`BL$` and `HBL$` are in that list for a reason worth learning from.** They are the two
eraser stamps, and they are built inside `DRAWPROTOS` — so left undeclared they were
created * in that routine's scope * , held a perfectly good handle while it ran, and were
empty everywhere else. Nothing failed; the first `GSHAPE` that used one simply refused with
"was given a string that did not come from SSHAPE", several routines away from the cause.
Chapter 17 Step 3 is about exactly this.
`DPLAY#` and `DHUD#` start at 1 so the first frame draws both.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
That block is 121 of the interpreter's 128 variables, which is why several constants in the
geometry are spelled out where they are used rather than given names: a name costs a slot
whether it holds a constant or not.
### The tables and the generator
```basic norun
LABEL LOADTABLES
FOR I# = 0 TO 5
READ BRC#(I#)
NEXT I#
FOR I# = 0 TO 5
READ BRV#(I#)
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
NEXT I#
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
FOR I# = 0 TO 7
READ ZVX%(I#)
NEXT I#
FOR I# = 0 TO 7
READ ZVY%(I#)
NEXT I#
RETURN
LABEL NEXTRAND
SEED# = MOD(SEED# * 1103515245 + 12345, 2147483648)
RNVAL# = MOD(SHR(SEED#, 16), RNMAX#)
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
RETURN
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```
```basic norun
DATA 3, 9, 8, 6, 4, 5
DATA 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10
DATA -0.85, -0.62, -0.40, -0.18, 0.18, 0.40, 0.62, 0.85
DATA -0.53, -0.78, -0.92, -0.98, -0.98, -0.92, -0.78, -0.53
```
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Row colours, what a brick in each row is worth, and the eight bounce zones from Step 8.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`NEXTRAND` is a `GOSUB` over globals rather than a `DEF` function. Set `RNMAX#` to the
number of answers you want and read `RNVAL#` .
The font loader is the same shape, and it needs a subroutine of its own for the inner read
rather than a `BEGIN` block, because a `FOR` nested inside a block that is itself inside a
`FOR` does not find its own `NEXT` :
```basic norun
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
LABEL LOADFONT
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
GX# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 40
READ N#
FNC#(I#) = N#
FNI#(I#) = GX#
IF N# > 0 THEN GOSUB READGLYPH
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
NEXT I#
RETURN
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
LABEL READGLYPH
FOR K# = 1 TO N# * 2
READ D#
FNS#(GX#) = D#
GX# = GX# + 1
NEXT K#
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`FNC#(g)` is glyph `g` 's stroke count and `FNI#(g)` is where its points start in `FNS#()` .
The 41 `DATA` lines are one per character of `ALPHA$` , **in that order ** — the `INSTR` in
`BUILDTEXT` gives a position in `ALPHA$` and that position is used directly as the glyph
number, so getting the two out of step silently draws the wrong letters. Here is the whole
font, in the format Step 8 gives:
```basic norun
REM A
DATA 4, 0,30, 0,6, 30,36, 3,33
REM B
DATA 6, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 6,36, 30,33, 33,36
REM C
DATA 3, 0,30, 0,6, 6,36
REM D
DATA 6, 0,6, 0,20, 20,31, 31,35, 35,26, 26,6
REM E
DATA 4, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 6,36
REM F
DATA 3, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33
REM G
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,6, 6,36, 33,36, 13,33
REM H
DATA 3, 0,6, 30,36, 3,33
REM I
DATA 1, 10,16
REM J
DATA 3, 30,36, 6,36, 3,6
REM K
DATA 3, 0,6, 30,3, 3,36
REM L
DATA 2, 0,6, 6,36
REM M
DATA 4, 0,6, 30,36, 0,13, 13,30
REM N
DATA 3, 0,6, 30,36, 0,36
REM O
DATA 4, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36
REM P
DATA 4, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 30,33
REM Q
DATA 5, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36, 24,36
REM R
DATA 5, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 30,33, 13,36
REM S
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,3, 3,33, 33,36, 6,36
REM T
DATA 2, 0,30, 10,16
REM U
DATA 3, 0,6, 30,36, 6,36
REM V
DATA 2, 0,16, 16,30
REM W
DATA 4, 0,6, 30,36, 6,13, 13,36
REM X
DATA 2, 0,36, 30,6
REM Y
DATA 3, 0,13, 30,13, 13,16
REM Z
DATA 3, 0,30, 30,6, 6,36
REM 0
DATA 5, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36, 30,6
REM 1
DATA 2, 10,16, 1,10
REM 2
DATA 5, 0,30, 30,33, 3,33, 3,6, 6,36
REM 3
DATA 4, 0,30, 30,36, 3,33, 6,36
REM 4
DATA 3, 0,3, 3,33, 30,36
REM 5
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,3, 3,33, 33,36, 6,36
REM 6
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,6, 3,33, 33,36, 6,36
REM 7
DATA 2, 0,30, 30,36
REM 8
DATA 5, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36, 3,33
REM 9
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,3, 3,33, 30,36, 6,36
REM space
DATA 0
REM colon
DATA 2, 12,13, 14,15
REM dash
DATA 1, 3,33
REM full stop
DATA 1, 15,16
REM exclamation mark
DATA 2, 10,14, 15,16
```
Space is `DATA 0` — no strokes — which is what the `IF N# > 0` in `LOADFONT` and the
`IF GN# = 0 THEN RETURN` in `BUILDGLYPH` are for.
### Input
```basic norun
LABEL READKEYS
GET KEYV#
IF KEYV# = 0 THEN RETURN
IF KEYV# = 1073741904 THEN PDDIR# = 0 - 1 : PDCO# = 7
IF KEYV# = 1073741903 THEN PDDIR# = 1 : PDCO# = 7
IF KEYV# = 32 THEN GOSUB PRESSFIRE
IF KEYV# = 112 THEN GOSUB PRESSPAUSE
IF KEYV# = 115 THEN GOSUB PRESSMUTE
IF KEYV# = 113 THEN RUNNING# = 0
IF KEYV# = 27 THEN RUNNING# = 0
GOTO READKEYS
LABEL PRESSFIRE
IF STATE# = 0 THEN GOSUB STARTGAME : RETURN
IF STATE# = 5 THEN GOSUB TITLESCREEN : RETURN
IF STATE# = 1 THEN GOSUB LAUNCH : RETURN
IF STATE# = 2 THEN GOSUB UNSTICK
RETURN
LABEL PRESSPAUSE
IF STATE# = 2 THEN STATE# = 6 : GMTYP# = 0 : BAN$ = "PAUSED" : GOSUB SETBANNER : RETURN
IF STATE# = 6 THEN STATE# = 2 : BAN$ = "" : GOSUB SETBANNER
RETURN
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
```
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`READKEYS` empties the queue by tail-calling itself with `GOTO` , which costs no scope.
A press buys seven frames of paddle travel in `PDCO#` and a held key keeps renewing it —
the same countdown idea Chapter 17 uses, sized for this game's frame rate. Seven frames
matters because the first key repeat is a quarter of a second behind the press, and a
paddle that stalled for a quarter of a second would be unusable.
### The paddle and the balls
```basic norun
LABEL MOVEPADDLE
IF PDCO# > 0 THEN BEGIN
PDCO# = PDCO# - 1
PDX% = PDX% + PDDIR# * 9
BEND
IF PDCO# < 1 THEN PDDIR# = 0
IF PDX% < WALLL# THEN PDX% = WALLL#
IF PDX% > WALLR# - PDW# THEN PDX% = WALLR# - PDW#
MOVSPR 3, PDX%, PDY#
IF CTON# = 0 THEN RETURN
CTX% = 0.0 - PDX% + WALLL# + WALLR# - 104
MOVSPR 4, CTX%, 470
RETURN
LABEL MOVEBALLS
FOR B# = 0 TO 2
IF BLON#(B#) = 1 THEN GOSUB MOVEONE
NEXT B#
RETURN
LABEL MOVEONE
IF BLST#(B#) = 1 THEN BEGIN
BLX%(B#) = PDX% + BLOFF#
BLY%(B#) = PDY# - 23
BEND
IF BLST#(B#) = 0 THEN BEGIN
BLX%(B#) = BLX%(B#) + BLVX%(B#)
BLY%(B#) = BLY%(B#) + BLVY%(B#)
GOSUB BALLWALLS
BEND
IF BLON#(B#) = 0 THEN RETURN
IF BLST#(B#) = 0 THEN BEGIN
GOSUB BALLPADDLE
BEND
MOVSPR 5 + B#, BLX%(B#), BLY%(B#)
RETURN
LABEL BALLWALLS
IF BLX%(B#) < WALLL# THEN BEGIN
BLX%(B#) = WALLL#
BLVX%(B#) = 0.0 - BLVX%(B#)
SOUND 1, 3609, 2
BEND
IF BLX%(B#) > WALLR# - 22 THEN BEGIN
BLX%(B#) = WALLR# - 22
BLVX%(B#) = 0.0 - BLVX%(B#)
SOUND 1, 3609, 2
BEND
IF BLY%(B#) < 72 THEN BEGIN
BLY%(B#) = 72
BLVY%(B#) = 0.0 - BLVY%(B#)
SOUND 1, 3609, 2
BEND
IF BLY%(B#) < 596 THEN RETURN
BLON#(B#) = 0
BLN# = BLN# - 1
SOUND 2, 2411, 6
SPRITE 5 + B#, 0
RETURN
LABEL BALLPADDLE
IF BLVY%(B#) < 0 THEN RETURN
HIT# = 0
T1# = PDX% : T2# = PDY# : T3# = PDW#
GOSUB HITBAR
IF CTON# = 0 THEN RETURN
IF HIT# = 1 THEN RETURN
T1# = CTX% : T2# = 470 : T3# = 104
GOSUB HITBAR
RETURN
```
Balls 0, 1 and 2 live in sprites 5, 6 and 7, which is why `MOVSPR 5 + B#` works.
`BLST#(B#)` is 1 while a ball is stuck to the paddle. Note the `0.0 -` on every sign flip,
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
for the reason in Step 8.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Brick collision is in Step 8.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
### The gem's fall
```basic norun
LABEL MOVEGEM
IF GMON# = 0 THEN RETURN
GMY% = GMY% + 3.2
MOVSPR 8, GMX%, GMY%
HIT# = 0
IF GMY% > 596 THEN HIT# = 1
IF GMY% + 46 > PDY# AND GMY% < PDY# + 24 THEN GOSUB CATCHGEM
IF HIT# = 0 THEN RETURN
GMON# = 0
SPRITE 8, 0
RETURN
LABEL CATCHGEM
IF GMX% + 48 < PDX% THEN RETURN
IF GMX% > PDX% + PDW# THEN RETURN
GOSUB TAKEGEM
HIT# = 1
RETURN
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
`TAKEGEM` is in Step 9. `HIT#` is doing double duty here as "this gem is finished with" —
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
it is set both by the gem going off the bottom and by it being caught.
### Turning text into strokes
Step 8 drew a glyph directly. The game builds a list instead, so the drawing can happen on
a later frame:
```basic norun
LABEL BUILDTEXT
TLEN# = LEN(TX$)
IF TLEN# = 0 THEN RETURN
TXI# = 0
DO
GC# = INSTR(ALPHA$, MID(TX$, TXI#, 1))
IF GC# > 0 - 1 THEN GOSUB BUILDGLYPH
TXI# = TXI# + 1
LOOP UNTIL TXI# >= TLEN#
RETURN
LABEL BUILDGLYPH
GN# = FNC#(GC#)
IF GN# = 0 THEN RETURN
GP# = FNI#(GC#)
GX# = TXX# + TXI# * TXS# * 5
GK# = 0
DO
P1# = FNS#(GP#) : P2# = FNS#(GP# + 1) : GP# = GP# + 2
IF BUILDH# = 1 AND HN# < 120 THEN BEGIN
HX1#(HN#) = GX# + (P1# / 10) * TXS#
HY1#(HN#) = TXY# + MOD(P1#, 10) * TXS#
HX2#(HN#) = GX# + (P2# / 10) * TXS#
HY2#(HN#) = TXY# + MOD(P2#, 10) * TXS#
HC#(HN#) = TXC#
HN# = HN# + 1
BEND
IF BUILDH# = 0 AND PN# < 110 THEN BEGIN
PX1#(PN#) = GX# + (P1# / 10) * TXS#
PY1#(PN#) = TXY# + MOD(P1#, 10) * TXS#
PX2#(PN#) = GX# + (P2# / 10) * TXS#
PY2#(PN#) = TXY# + MOD(P2#, 10) * TXS#
PC#(PN#) = TXC#
PN# = PN# + 1
BEND
GK# = GK# + 1
LOOP UNTIL GK# >= GN#
RETURN
```
Set `TX$` , `TXX#` , `TXY#` , `TXS#` (the scale) and `TXC#` (the colour source), then set
`BUILDH#` to 1 for the HUD list or 0 for the field list, and `GOSUB BUILDTEXT` . Both `DO`
loops test at the bottom, so a one-character string and a one-stroke glyph both work.
The bounds tests — `HN# < 120` and `PN# < 110` — are what stops a long string running off
the end of the arrays.
```basic norun
LABEL HUDTEXT
HN# = 0
BUILDH# = 1
TXS# = 4
TXY# = 14
TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 24
TX$ = "SCORE"
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXC# = 2 : TXX# = 144
T4# = SCORE#
GOSUB FMTNUM
TX$ = NUM$
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 316
TX$ = "LIVES"
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXC# = 6 : TXX# = 436
TX$ = "" + LIVES#
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 500
TX$ = "LEVEL"
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXC# = 4 : TXX# = 620
TX$ = "" + LEVEL#
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
DHUD# = 1
RETURN
LABEL FMTNUM
NUM$ = ""
T2# = T4#
FOR I# = 1 TO 6
D# = MOD(T2#, 10)
NUM$ = MID("0123456789", D#, 1) + NUM$
T2# = T2# / 10
NEXT I#
RETURN
```
`HUDTEXT` rebuilds the whole list from `HN# = 0` and sets `DHUD#` ; the frame loop draws it
whenever it next gets a turn.
`SETBANNER` is the same idea for the field list — the message that flashes over the play
area, in the colour of the gem that put it there:
```basic norun
LABEL SETBANNER
PN# = 0
DPLAY# = 1
IF BAN$ = "" THEN RETURN
BUILDH# = 0
TXS# = 8
TXY# = 430
TXX# = 400 - LEN(BAN$) * 20
TXC# = 5
IF GMTYP# = 1 THEN TXC# = 4
IF GMTYP# = 2 THEN TXC# = 2
IF GMTYP# = 3 THEN TXC# = 6
IF GMTYP# = 4 THEN TXC# = 1
IF GMTYP# = 5 THEN TXC# = 3
TX$ = BAN$
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
RETURN
```
Setting `BAN$` to `""` and calling it is how a banner is cleared: `PN# = 0` empties the
field's stroke list and `DPLAY# = 1` asks for a redraw without it. Sources 1 to 6 are cyan,
yellow, purple, light red, light grey and green, and the five gems are red, yellow, green,
blue and purple — so the banner is as close to the gem as seven colour sources allow.
### The state changes
Six routines, each the same shape: set `STATE#` , set `STIMER#` if the state has a duration,
set the banner, and mark whatever is now out of date.
```basic norun
LABEL BALLGONE
SOUND 2, 7218, 30, 2, 1804, 220
LIVES# = LIVES# - 1
STATE# = 3
STIMER# = 45
GMTYP# = 0
BAN$ = "MISS"
GOSUB SETBANNER
GOSUB HUDTEXT
RETURN
LABEL SERVEAGAIN
BAN$ = ""
GOSUB SETBANNER
GOSUB CLEARPOWERS
GOSUB RESETBALL
STATE# = 1
RETURN
LABEL LEVELDONE
PLAY "V3 T2 U8 O4 QC QE QG O5 HC"
STATE# = 4
STIMER# = 60
GMTYP# = 0
BAN$ = "CLEAR"
GOSUB SETBANNER
RETURN
LABEL STARTGAME
PLAY "V3 T2 U8 O4 IC IE IG O5 IC"
SCORE# = 0
LIVES# = 3
LEVEL# = 1
GOSUB SETUPLEVEL
RETURN
```
`GMTYP# = 0` before a banner that is not a gem's is what makes `SETBANNER` pick its default
colour rather than the last gem's.
`TITLESCREEN` and `GAMEISOVER` are longer only because both draw a screenful of lettering.
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Both clear the brick array and retire every rectangle with a bare `SOLID` , turn the paddle
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
and ball sprites off, reset `PN#` , and then build their text at a large `TXS#` :
```basic norun
LABEL TITLESCREEN
STATE# = 0
STIMER# = 0
GOSUB CLEARPOWERS
BLN# = 0
BRN# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 59
BRK#(I#) = 0
NEXT I#
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
SOLID
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
SPRITE 3, 0
SPRITE 5, 0
SPRITE 6, 0
SPRITE 7, 0
PN# = 0
TXS# = 12 : TXC# = 2 : TXX# = 120 : TXY# = 170
TX$ = "BREAKOUT"
BUILDH# = 0
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXS# = 4 : TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 220 : TXY# = 370
TX$ = "SPACE TO START"
BUILDH# = 0
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
HN# = 0
TXS# = 3 : TXC# = 6 : TXX# = 40 : TXY# = 20
TX$ = "ARROWS MOVE P PAUSE Q QUIT"
BUILDH# = 1
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
DPLAY# = 1
DHUD# = 1
RETURN
```
`GAMEISOVER` is the same routine with `"GAME OVER"` , the final score and the best score,
and `STATE# = 5` — the state whose only exit is space, back to the title.
### Serving, and clearing up
```basic norun
LABEL RESETBALL
FOR B# = 0 TO 2
BLON#(B#) = 0
BLST#(B#) = 0
NEXT B#
SPRITE 6, 0
SPRITE 7, 0
BLON#(0) = 1
BLN# = 1
BSPD% = SPD%
PDX% = 348
PDW# = 104
BLOFF# = 41
SPRITE 3, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0
SPRITE 5, 1, 2
MOVSPR 3, PDX%, PDY#
BLX%(0) = PDX% + BLOFF#
BLY%(0) = PDY# - 23
MOVSPR 5, BLX%(0), BLY%(0)
RETURN
LABEL LAUNCH
SOUND 1, 6431, 3
STATE# = 2
BLST#(0) = 0
BLVX%(0) = ZVX%(5) * SPD%
BLVY%(0) = ZVY%(5) * SPD%
RETURN
LABEL CLEARPOWERS
GOSUB LEVELSPEED
PDW# = 104
PDEXP# = 0
SLOWT# = 0
STKON# = 0
STKT# = 0
CTON# = 0
CTTM# = 0
GMON# = 0
BANT# = 0
BLOFF# = 41
SPRITE 4, 0
SPRITE 8, 0
SPRITE 3, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0
RETURN
LABEL FILLROW
FOR C# = 0 TO 9
BRK#(R# * 10 + C#) = 1
BRN# = BRN# + 1
2026-08-02 13:35:14 -04:00
SLX# = BRKX# + C# * 72
SLY# = BRKY# + R# * 24
SLI# = (R# * 10 + C#) + 1
SOLID SLI#, SLX#, SLY#, SLX# + 68, SLY# + 16
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
NEXT C#
RETURN
LABEL SHUTDOWN
FOR I# = 1 TO 8
SPRITE I#, 0
NEXT I#
IF SCORE# > HISCORE# THEN HISCORE# = SCORE#
PRINT "FINAL SCORE " + SCORE# + " BEST " + HISCORE#
END
```
The six state changes — `BALLGONE` , `SERVEAGAIN` , `LEVELDONE` , `GAMEISOVER` ,
`TITLESCREEN` and `STARTGAME` — are above, with `SETBANNER` .
### The two draw routines, whole
Step 4 built the stamps and Step 7 stamped a row; these are the two routines Step 6's queue
actually calls, with those pieces in place.
```basic norun
LABEL DRAWPROTOS
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 1
FOR R# = 0 TO 5
COLOR 1, BRC#(R#)
T1# = R# * 20
T2# = T1# + 8
FOR K# = 0 TO 7
DRAW 1, 0, T1# + K# TO 67, T1# + K# : DRAW 1, 0, T2# + K# TO 67, T2# + K#
NEXT K#
NEXT R#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 0, 68, 16 : S0$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 20, 68, 36 : S1$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 40, 68, 56 : S2$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 68, 76 : S3$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 80, 68, 96 : S4$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 100, 68, 116 : S5$ = Z$
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
plus Step 6's two erasers, and then `DPLAY# = 1` and `DHUD# = 1` so the first frame draws
both. Called once from the setup block: nothing captures per frame, so eight of the sixteen
`SSHAPE` slots are spent here and never again, and `GRAPHIC 5` is never called at all.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic norun
LABEL DRAWPLAY
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 2
COLOR 0, 1 : COLOR 1, 4 : COLOR 2, 8 : COLOR 3, 5
COLOR 4, 11 : COLOR 5, 16 : COLOR 6, 6
BOX 5, 2, 62, 797, 597 : BOX 1, 6, 66, 793, 593
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
FOR R# = 0 TO 5
IF R# = 0 THEN Z$ = S0$
IF R# = 1 THEN Z$ = S1$
IF R# = 2 THEN Z$ = S2$
IF R# = 3 THEN Z$ = S3$
IF R# = 4 THEN Z$ = S4$
IF R# = 5 THEN Z$ = S5$
FOR C# = 0 TO 9
IF BRK#(R# * 10 + C#) > 0 THEN GSHAPE Z$, BRKX# + C# * 72, BRKY# + R# * 24
NEXT C#
NEXT R#
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
IF PN# = 1 THEN DRAW PC#(0), PX1#(0), PY1#(0) TO PX2#(0), PY2#(0)
IF PN# < 2 THEN GOTO PLDONE
FOR I# = 0 TO PN# - 1
DRAW PC#(I#), PX1#(I#), PY1#(I#) TO PX2#(I#), PY2#(I#)
NEXT I#
LABEL PLDONE
RETURN
```
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
Same shape as `DRAWHUD` in Step 7: the walls, then the bricks, then the field's own stroke
list with its one-item case beside the loop. Nothing at the end — what is drawn is on the
screen.
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
**A label is one bare word.** `PLDONE` and `HUDONE` have no underscore in them, and cannot:
underscores are not part of an identifier here.
### Game over
`TITLESCREEN` is above. `GAMEISOVER` is the same routine with different text, `STATE# = 5` ,
and the high score recorded on the way in:
```basic norun
LABEL GAMEISOVER
PLAY "V3 T1 U8 O4 QG QE QC O3 HG"
IF SCORE# > HISCORE# THEN HISCORE# = SCORE#
STATE# = 5
GOSUB CLEARPOWERS
BRN# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 59
BRK#(I#) = 0
NEXT I#
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
SOLID
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
SPRITE 3, 0
SPRITE 5, 0
PN# = 0
TXS# = 9 : TXC# = 4 : TXX# = 148 : TXY# = 230
TX$ = "GAME OVER"
BUILDH# = 0
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXS# = 5 : TXC# = 2 : TXX# = 200 : TXY# = 380
T4# = SCORE#
GOSUB FMTNUM
TX$ = "SCORE " + NUM$
BUILDH# = 0
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
HN# = 0
TXS# = 3 : TXC# = 5 : TXY# = 20 : TXX# = 40
T4# = HISCORE#
GOSUB FMTNUM
TX$ = "BEST " + NUM$
BUILDH# = 1
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
TXC# = 6 : TXX# = 400
TX$ = "SPACE FOR TITLE"
BUILDH# = 1
GOSUB BUILDTEXT
DPLAY# = 1
DHUD# = 1
RETURN
```
Three sizes of lettering on one screen, from one font table: `TXS# = 9` for the message,
5 for the score and 3 for the HUD strip. Setting `HN# = 0` partway through is what switches
from building the field's list to rebuilding the HUD's.
### Check it before you have a window
Run the assembled file through the plain build first:
```sh norun
$ ./build/basic mybreakout.bas
```
It will stop at the first `SPRSAV` with a message about a missing sprite device, which
means everything above it parsed. A parse error, a bad `DATA` read or an `OUT OF DATA` at
this stage is a real problem, and it is much easier to find without a window in the way.
Then run it properly:
```sh norun
$ ./build-akgl/basic mybreakout.bas
```
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
## The budgets
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
This program sits close to five ceilings at once, and knowing where they are is what stops
a feature costing an afternoon before it is abandoned.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
| Resource | There are | This game uses |
|---|---|---|
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
| Sprites | 8 | 6 |
| Variables | 128 | 123, plus 4 the interpreter makes |
| Labels | 64 | 57 |
| `SSHAPE` slots | 16, none reclaimed except by `GRAPHIC 5` | 8, spent once at startup |
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
| Colour sources | 7 | 7 |
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
| Scopes | 32 | 6 deep at most |
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
| Tokens on a line | 32, and the 33rd stops the interpreter rather than raising | short lines, temporaries instead of long conditions |
| Value-pool slots | 4096 for arrays; a plain number costs none | fifteen arrays, all declared once |
That is also why several things are **not ** in the game, and they are worth naming rather
than leaving to be discovered: no music under the play, only event sounds and two four-note
stings; one gem at a time; sticky and multiball share one offset, so two balls stuck to the
paddle sit on top of each other; and no high score on disk, because there is no disk.
## The picture at the top of this chapter
Every figure in this guide is generated by running the listing beside it, and the one at
the top of this chapter is no exception. It is Step 4's field, Step 8's stroke font and
Step 1's artwork, with the numbers filled in by hand and no frame loop, so it draws one
frame and stops.
The font here carries only the fourteen glyphs the HUD needs, in the order they appear in
2026-08-02 13:13:51 -04:00
`ALPHA$` — which is the ordering rule from Step 7, shown small enough to check by eye:
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
```basic requires=akgl setup=breakout_art screenshot=breakout-game-artwork size=800x600
DIM BRC#(6)
DIM FNC#(14)
DIM FNI#(14)
DIM FNS#(100)
ALPHA$ = "SCOERLIV 01235"
I# = 0
R# = 0
C# = 0
K# = 0
N# = 0
D# = 0
T1# = 0
T2# = 0
GP# = 0
GX# = 0
GX2# = 0
GK# = 0
TLEN# = 0
P1# = 0
P2# = 0
X1# = 0
Y1# = 0
X2# = 0
Y2# = 0
SZ# = 0
TX$ = ""
TXX# = 0
TXY# = 0
TXC# = 1
TXI# = 0
GC# = 0
Z$ = ""
S0$ = ""
S1$ = ""
S2$ = ""
S3$ = ""
S4$ = ""
FOR I# = 0 TO 5
READ BRC#(I#)
NEXT I#
GX# = 0
FOR I# = 0 TO 13
READ N#
FNC#(I#) = N#
FNI#(I#) = GX#
IF N# > 0 THEN GOSUB READGLYPH
NEXT I#
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 1
FOR R# = 0 TO 5
COLOR 1, BRC#(R#)
T1# = R# * 20
T2# = T1# + 8
FOR K# = 0 TO 7
DRAW 1, 0, T1# + K# TO 67, T1# + K# : DRAW 1, 0, T2# + K# TO 67, T2# + K#
NEXT K#
NEXT R#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 0, 68, 16 : S0$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 20, 68, 36 : S1$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 40, 68, 56 : S2$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 68, 76 : S3$ = Z$
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 80, 68, 96 : S4$ = Z$
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 2
COLOR 0, 1 : COLOR 1, 4 : COLOR 2, 8 : COLOR 3, 5
COLOR 4, 11 : COLOR 5, 16 : COLOR 6, 6
BOX 5, 2, 62, 797, 597
BOX 1, 6, 66, 793, 593
FOR C# = 0 TO 9
Z$ = S0$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 108
Z$ = S1$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 132
Z$ = S2$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 156
NEXT C#
FOR C# = 1 TO 8
Z$ = S3$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 180
NEXT C#
FOR C# = 2 TO 6
Z$ = S4$ : GSHAPE Z$, 42 + C# * 72, 204
NEXT C#
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 60, 800, 600
SPRSAV Z$, 2
SPRITE 2, 1, 2
MOVSPR 2, 0, 60
GRAPHIC 1, 1
WIDTH 1
COLOR 0, 1 : COLOR 1, 4 : COLOR 2, 8 : COLOR 3, 5
COLOR 4, 11 : COLOR 5, 16 : COLOR 6, 6
BOX 5, 0, 56, 799, 57
SZ# = 4
TXY# = 14
TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 24 : TX$ = "SCORE" : GOSUB DRAWTEXT
TXC# = 2 : TXX# = 144 : TX$ = "001250" : GOSUB DRAWTEXT
TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 316 : TX$ = "LIVES" : GOSUB DRAWTEXT
TXC# = 6 : TXX# = 436 : TX$ = "3" : GOSUB DRAWTEXT
TXC# = 1 : TXX# = 500 : TX$ = "LEVEL" : GOSUB DRAWTEXT
TXC# = 4 : TXX# = 620 : TX$ = "2" : GOSUB DRAWTEXT
SSHAPE Z$, 0, 0, 800, 60
SPRSAV Z$, 1
SPRITE 1, 1, 2
MOVSPR 1, 0, 0
SPRSAV "art/paddleBlu.png", 3
SPRSAV "art/ballBlue.png", 5
SPRSAV "art/element_green_polygon_glossy.png", 8
SPRITE 3, 1, 2
SPRITE 5, 1, 2
SPRITE 8, 1, 2
MOVSPR 3, 300, 540
MOVSPR 5, 420, 400
MOVSPR 8, 200, 300
END
LABEL READGLYPH
FOR K# = 1 TO N# * 2
READ D#
FNS#(GX#) = D#
GX# = GX# + 1
NEXT K#
RETURN
LABEL DRAWTEXT
TLEN# = LEN(TX$)
IF TLEN# = 0 THEN RETURN
TXI# = 0
DO
GC# = INSTR(ALPHA$, MID(TX$, TXI#, 1))
IF GC# > 0 - 1 THEN GOSUB DRAWGLYPH
TXI# = TXI# + 1
LOOP UNTIL TXI# >= TLEN#
RETURN
LABEL DRAWGLYPH
N# = FNC#(GC#)
IF N# = 0 THEN RETURN
GP# = FNI#(GC#)
GX2# = TXX# + TXI# * SZ# * 5
GK# = 0
DO
P1# = FNS#(GP#)
P2# = FNS#(GP# + 1)
GP# = GP# + 2
X1# = GX2# + (P1# / 10) * SZ#
Y1# = TXY# + MOD(P1#, 10) * SZ#
X2# = GX2# + (P2# / 10) * SZ#
Y2# = TXY# + MOD(P2#, 10) * SZ#
DRAW TXC#, X1#, Y1# TO X2#, Y2#
GK# = GK# + 1
LOOP UNTIL GK# >= N#
RETURN
DATA 3, 9, 8, 6, 4, 5
REM S
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,3, 3,33, 33,36, 6,36
REM C
DATA 3, 0,30, 0,6, 6,36
REM O
DATA 4, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36
REM E
DATA 4, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 6,36
REM R
DATA 5, 0,6, 0,30, 3,33, 30,33, 13,36
REM L
DATA 2, 0,6, 6,36
REM I
DATA 1, 10,16
REM V
DATA 2, 0,16, 16,30
REM space
DATA 0
REM 0
DATA 5, 0,30, 6,36, 0,6, 30,36, 30,6
REM 1
DATA 2, 10,16, 1,10
REM 2
DATA 5, 0,30, 30,33, 3,33, 3,6, 6,36
REM 3
DATA 4, 0,30, 30,36, 3,33, 6,36
REM 5
DATA 5, 0,30, 0,3, 3,33, 33,36, 6,36
```
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
`DRAWTEXT` and `DRAWGLYPH` are `DO ... LOOP UNTIL` rather than `FOR` , which is Step 7's
rule earning its keep twice on one screen: `"3"` is one character long and the `I` glyph is
one stroke, and a `FOR` would have drawn neither.
Bring the tutorials back in line with the fixed interpreter
Eleven of the thirteen defects these two games found are fixed, and the
chapters that taught around them said things that are no longer true.
Chapter 17: the drawing verbs are no longer invisible, they are covered by a
text layer that `WINDOW` can now shrink; the cell size is `RGR(3)` and the grid
is `RWINDOW`, not a hand-measured constant; a character written past a short
row's end lands. Chapter 18: traps 3 and 4 -- the skipped block that broke its
caller's `RETURN`, and `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript -- become history rather
than warnings, and Step 3 no longer claims a sprite is the *only* way to put a
picture up, only the one that costs nothing.
**Neither `.bas` listing changes, and both READMEs now say why.** The character
game still writes `CW# = 16` and the artwork game still keeps six brick stamps
in six scalars. What those listings are worth is being what a program written
against those constraints looks like, with comments explaining what each one was
avoiding -- rewriting them to pretend the problems never existed would throw
that away. So Chapter 17 Step 2 shows the `RGR(3)`/`RWINDOW` form and says
plainly that the listing beside it does not use it. That is the one place in
either chapter where a quoted fragment is not verbatim from the game.
Also: the closing pointers now say which entries are struck and which stand, and
the budgets table in Chapter 18 notes that several of those budgets were tighter
when the game was written.
TODO.md section 9 item 3 is updated rather than struck: the `WINDOW` half is
fixed, the default text area owning the whole window is not, and whether that
default is right is a question rather than a defect.
Verified against the fixed interpreter: both games run 45 seconds on the SDL
frontend with no error line and the score climbing; both suites are green in
both configurations; `docs_examples` passes and `docs_screenshots --check`
re-renders all thirteen figures byte-identically; coverage is 95.0% of lines
against the 90 gate, with src/variable.c at 100%; and every other quoted
fragment still appears verbatim in the listing it came from.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-02 00:31:06 -04:00
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
## Where to go next
- **[Chapter 8 ](08-sprites.md )** is the sprite reference: every form of `SPRSAV` , the
`MOVSPR` forms, collision and what `RSPPOS` reads back.
- **[Chapter 6 ](06-graphics.md )** is the drawing reference, including `SSHAPE` , `GSHAPE`
and what a shape handle is.
- **[Chapter 7 ](07-sound.md )** is `SOUND` , `PLAY` , `ENVELOPE` and `VOL` .
Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary
Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained
why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and
led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got
the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program.
Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a
bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its
goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and
Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the
file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to.
Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a
listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the
`TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second.
**Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to
state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`,
because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and
the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is
matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12
did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope,
so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is
why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather
than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into:
there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`.
**`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1`
fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure
without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size
the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size,
and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in
the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed.
Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are
generated from listings in the chapters like every other one.
Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and
telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off
limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing:
routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`,
the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those
are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself
for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built
a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found,
and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10.
One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not
set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already
caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and
`docs_screenshots --check` pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL
2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
- **[Chapter 3 ](03-the-language.md )** has the arithmetic rules from Step 9 in full.
Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them
Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/`
draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and
paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with
`SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely
this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for.
`docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md`
build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real
program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row
whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every
trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value
pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its
caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor.
Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`,
and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's
own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host
omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead.
`docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value
rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the
conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`.
`TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30
to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file
and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch.
Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations,
`docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares
them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment
was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every
relative link and anchor resolves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
- **[Chapter 14 ](14-architecture.md )** explains the step loop and the pools this chapter
keeps running into, from the interpreter's side.
