GOTO 100 in a script written without line numbers finds the hundredth line
and branches there. Silent, plausible and wrong: the test for it loops
forever printing the second line when the check is removed.
akbasic_runtime_check_targets() is a fourth prescan beside the label, DATA
and TYPE ones, run on every entry into MODE_RUN -- the earliest the check
can be made and the only place all four ways a program arrives pass
through. A target naming an empty line is still allowed, for the same
reason RENUMBER leaves one alone, and a fully numbered program is
unaffected, which is every program that existed before this.
It shares RENUMBER's walk rather than repeating it. renumber.c grows an
akbasic_TargetWalk -- a self pointer and a visit function -- and
rewrite_line() takes one. RENUMBER's visitor substitutes the number a line
moved to; the check's substitutes the number unchanged and raises. One
walk, so the two cannot disagree about what a branch target is.
The check points environment->lineno at the line being walked so the "? N :"
prefix names the offending line. The other three prescans do not and report
whichever line the loader stopped on; TODO.md section 5 item 64 records it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes groups A, C, D, E, F, H and J of TODO.md section 4, plus RESTORE and
RENUMBER, and closes section 6 -- all seventeen reference defects. Seven of
those turned out to have been fixed or never ported and nobody had written it
down; the audit records the evidence for each.
Two of the seventeen were real. math_plus mutated its left operand when the
operand was mutable, so A# + 1 could modify A#; it was gated on FOR/NEXT
coverage because NEXT relied on the mutation, so tests/for_next.c came first
and NEXT now writes the counter back itself. And the binary operators summed
both numeric fields of their right operand, which no BASIC program can reach
-- that one needed a test written against the value API.
Writing the tests turned up eight defects nobody had listed. Seven are fixed:
IF A = 2 THEN was a parse error; only == worked
IF ... AND ... was a parse error, because a condition parsed as one relation
IF A = 1 OR B = 2 THEN was silently always false, and so was IF A THEN
EXIT before any NEXT restarted the program and exhausted the variable pool
READ never found a DATA line above it, and swallowed the lines between
PRINT 2 + 2 at the prompt was filed as program text instead of answering
a short read discarded its bytes, so COPY produced empty files
every verb taking an argument list said "peek() returned nil token!" on none
The eighth is not fixed and cannot be quietly: a FOR whose step overshoots
runs its body one extra time, and FOR I = 1 TO 1 runs it zero times. The two
errors cancel for a step of 1, which is why neither was noticed. Correcting
them changes the expected output of a checked-in acceptance file, and
tests/reference/README.md forbids editing one to suit this interpreter. It is
tests/for_semantics.c in AKBASIC_KNOWN_FAILING_TESTS, asserting the correct
contract, and TODO.md items 19 and 20.
Sprites are real libakgl actors with a renderfunc of their own, because
akgl_actor_render draws every sprite square and an actor has no per-axis
scale. Both are filed upstream. SPRSAV takes an image file, an SSHAPE handle
or a 63-element integer array -- a string here cannot hold a zero byte.
Verbs that need hardware that does not exist are refused by name with the
reason rather than faked: SYS, HEADER, COLLECT, BACKUP, BOOT, FILTER, and
DIRECTORY, which is refused for a missing libakstdlib wrapper filed upstream.
94 tests in the default build, 93 with SDL, 94 under ASan and UBSan, doxygen
clean. The Go acceptance corpus stayed green throughout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The token has existed since the scanner was written and nothing read it, so
10 PRINT A$ : REM ... was a parse error. Leading separators are consumed
before each statement and an empty statement yields a NULL leaf rather than
an error, so a trailing colon and a run of them are both legal.
BASIC 7.0 scopes everything after THEN to the condition, which the reference
had no opinion about because it never got here. The rule is not "skip when
false": the rest of the line belongs to whichever arm was written last.
A whole FOR/NEXT on one line still does not loop -- block skipping works by
source line. Recorded in TODO.md as what group A has to fix first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
