3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Andrew Kesterson	1fb808f480	Rewrite the two game tutorials as instructions rather than commentary ... Chapters 17 and 18 read as a code review of a finished listing: they explained why each decision had been made, walked through the project's own history, and led with what had once been broken. A reader who wanted to build the game got the reasoning and had to reconstruct the program. Both are now step-by-step. Each opens with a picture of the finished game and a bullet list of the steps, each bullet is a section, and each section states its goal, shows the code, and says how to check it. Chapter 17 is sixteen steps and Chapter 18 is thirteen, and the last of each is the assembly: the order of the file, the full declaration block, and the routines the earlier steps referred to. Project history is gone -- it belongs in Chapter 14 and in git -- and where a listing has to do something awkward, the tutorial shows how first and names the `TODO.md` item that will make it unnecessary second. **Three defects had no entry anywhere**, which the rewrite found by trying to state each rule as a rule. §6 item 35: `a - b + c` computes `a - (b + c)`, because `subtraction()` sits above `addition()` as its own precedence level and the inner loop eats the `+`. Item 36: only one unparenthesised `AND` or `OR` is matched, which is item 12's `if`-where-`while` on the one operator pair item 12 did not reach. Item 37: a `GOTO` out of a `FOR` or a `DO` leaks the loop's scope, so a main loop written that way stops on the thirty-second lost life -- which is why both games are built out of `LABEL` and `GOTO`, and it is a workaround rather than a preference. Chapter 3 gains the identifier rule the third trial ran into: there is no underscore in a name, and the error says `UNKNOWN TOKEN _`. **`tools/screenshot.c` learned to draw the text layer**, behind a new `text=1` fence attribute, because Chapter 17's game is characters in the grid and a figure without that layer is two sprites on black. It opens the bundled font at the size the standalone frontend uses, so a figure's cell size is the reader's cell size, and it uses the akgl sink alone rather than a tee so the program's output lands in the picture instead of on the stdout the caller reads to decide a figure failed. Both new figures -- `breakout-game.png` and `breakout-game-artwork.png` -- are generated from listings in the chapters like every other one. Verified by handing each chapter, alone, to an agent on a much smaller model and telling it to build the game from the tutorial text with the `examples/` tree off limits. The first pass scored 3.5 and 3 out of 10 and named what was missing: routines referred to but never shown, the third level layout, the sprite `DATA`, the font table, edits to earlier routines that were never marked as edits. Those are now in. The second pass built a 658-line Chapter 17 game that plays itself for ninety seconds with the score at 1890 and no error line, and the third built a 1053-line Chapter 18 game with 61 labels, no invented routines, no gaps found, and forty seconds clean. 9/10 and 8/10. One real bug in the new prose, caught in review: Chapter 18's `HITBAR` did not set the `HIT#` that `BALLPADDLE` reads to decide whether the paddle already caught the ball. Both suites green in both configurations, `docs_examples` and `docs_screenshots --check` pass. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL	2026-08-02 08:08:23 -04:00
Andrew Kesterson	cb0e2d0800	Add two Breakout examples and the tutorials that build them ... Two complete games in `examples/breakout/`, both 100% BASIC: `characters/` draws its wall in the text grid with two `DATA` sprites for the ball and paddle, and `sprites/` loads CC0 artwork and captures its whole screen with `SSHAPE`/`SPRSAV`. They take opposite shapes for reasons that are entirely this interpreter's, which is what the chapters are for. `docs/17-tutorial-breakout.md` and `docs/18-tutorial-breakout-artwork.md` build each one a step at a time, and end in a checklist of the rules a real program runs into: create every name before the loop starts, write a text row whole, loop with `GOTO` rather than `DO`, put the float on the left. Every trap is a runnable block with its own output rather than a claim -- the value pool dying at four thousand names, the skipped `BEGIN` block that breaks its caller's `RETURN`, `SSHAPE` ignoring a subscript, `READ`'s single cursor. Five figures, generated from the listings beside them by `docs_screenshots`, and a `breakout_art` setup so the ones that load artwork load the example's own. The character game's wall cannot be photographed -- the screenshot host omits the text layer on purpose -- so it is shown as compared output instead. `docs/07-sound.md` never said `SOUND`'s frequency is a SID register value rather than hertz, which both games depend on. It says so now, with the conversion from `src/audio_tables.c:84`. `TODO.md` gains the thirteen defects the two games turned up -- §6 items 30 to 33 and all of §9 -- each with a reduction that fits on a screen, the file and line of the cause, and what a fix would touch. Verified: `docs_examples` passes in both build configurations, `docs_screenshots --check` re-renders all thirteen figures and byte-compares them, the full 109-test suite passes in both builds, every quoted fragment was checked to appear verbatim in the listing it came from, and every relative link and anchor resolves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-01 22:54:42 -04:00
Andrew Kesterson	16b38c1138	Generate the documentation's figures from the listings they illustrate ... Chapters 6 and 8 described what a verb draws in prose. Eight figures now show it, and each one is produced by running the BASIC listing printed immediately above it -- so a picture cannot drift away from the code beside it, which is the way a screenshot goes wrong and the way nothing notices. tools/screenshot.c is a second SDL host, much smaller than the frontend: dummy video driver, software renderer, run to completion, read the target back, write a PNG. It draws no text layer on purpose, so a READY in the corner is not noise in a figure about BOX and no font has to be resolved. tools/docs_screenshots.sh reads the new screenshot=NAME fence tag straight out of the markdown. size=WxH is the second tag, and SCALE's figure uses it: the point being made is a 320x200 listing filling a larger window, which cannot be made on a 320x200 surface. Two gates, answering different questions. docs_examples fails a tagged block with no image, in both configurations, so a figure cannot be added and forgotten. docs_screenshots -- a CTest, AKGL build only -- re-renders every figure and compares byte for byte, so a listing edited without regenerating fails. Only the second catches a stale picture. The PNGs are checked in because a reader on the forge has no build tree, and docs/images/README.md says loudly that they are generated. Regenerating is never part of a build: the target is run deliberately, so a make cannot put eight binary diffs in front of whoever ran it. Drawing the BOX figure caught a defect in TODO.md itself. Deviation 16 claimed in bold that BOX fills on a negative angle while its own paragraph said the fill was filed rather than implemented. BOX cannot fill, and filled_rect is reached by no verb as a result. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-01 07:37:04 -04:00