0.9.0 is the akgl_ui subsystem: a vendored clay, an arena, menus, HUDs and dialogs, reached through a new akgl/ui.h this project does not include. Every header the akbasic_akgl target actually compiles against is byte-identical to 0.8.0, so unlike the 0.8.0 bump there is no sizeof to get wrong. The floor in include/akbasic/akgl.h moves to 0.9.0 anyway, on the standing rule that the soname carries MAJOR.MINOR while the major is 0. It does not configure as it stands. 0.9.0 moved eight test property calls off set_tests_properties -- correctly, because that command splits a semicolon-separated value and had been silently reducing its LD_LIBRARY_PATH prepend list to one directory -- onto set_property(TEST ...). This repository suppresses add_test() while it pulls its dependencies in, so those test names do not exist, and set_property errors on an unknown test name where set_tests_properties was silent: eight hard configure failures. Shadow set_property in its TEST form only; every other form has to pass through, since the dependencies set target and directory properties their own builds need. libakgl's status band grew to seven codes with AKGL_ERR_UI and it now owns 256 to 262, so the coordinated range map, docs/15-error-codes.md and both header comments follow. TODO.md section 5's persistent-drawing-layer item still stands: 0.9.0's arena draws inside the frame like everything else, and there is still no render-to-texture layer. Both configurations build and both suites pass -- 110/110 without libakgl, 111/111 with it, akgl_typing included. Co-Authored-By: Tachikoma (Claude Code Opus 5 1M) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EwxGB6TdoVvZ11KQQME9cL Co-Authored-By: Andrew Kesterson <andrew@aklabs.net>
7.2 KiB
15. Appendix: error codes
Two different things get called "the error" in this interpreter, and a program author
meets both. The report is the line printed when something goes wrong and nothing
catches it. The code is the number ER# holds when a TRAP handler catches it.
This appendix is the complete list of each.
Chapter 4 is where error trapping is explained; this is the reference you come back to
once you already know what a TRAP is.
The report
An error nothing traps is printed as one line and stops the run:
10 PRINT LEFT(1, 2)
20 PRINT "NEVER REACHED"
? 10 : RUNTIME ERROR LEFT expected a string
The shape is ? line : CLASS message. There are exactly four classes, and which one
you get says when the interpreter gave up rather than what was wrong:
| Class | Raised when |
|---|---|
PARSE ERROR |
The line could not be turned into a statement. Nothing on it ran. Also what the four prescans report as, since they run before any statement does. |
SYNTAX ERROR |
A statement was well-formed but not a legal one here. |
RUNTIME ERROR |
A statement ran and failed. The commonest by a wide margin. |
IO ERROR |
Reading the program itself failed — not a file a program opened, which is a RUNTIME ERROR like any other. |
The line number is where the interpreter was, which for a PARSE ERROR is the line
that would not parse and for a RUNTIME ERROR is the line that failed.
The code
ER# is the code, EL# is the line, and ERR(n) is the message text for a code.
They are ordinary global variables here rather than the bare ER and EL a C128
exposes; Chapter 13 says why.
Every one of them is set for a trapped error, and a parse error is trappable too:
10 TRAP 200
20 DIM Q#(2)
30 SCALE
40 PRINT LEFT(1, 2)
50 GOTO NOWHERE
60 PRINT Q#(9)
70 PRINT 1 / 0
80 RESUME
90 FILTER 1, 1
100 END
200 PRINT "LINE " + EL# + ": " + ER# + " " + ERR(ER#)
210 RESUME NEXT
LINE 30: 512 Syntax Error
LINE 40: 513 Type Error
LINE 50: 514 Undefined Reference
LINE 60: 515 Out Of Bounds
LINE 70: 517 Value Error
LINE 80: 518 State Error
LINE 90: 519 Device Error
That program is run by the test suite, so the numbers in the table below are checked
rather than claimed. Line 90 is FILTER rather than a drawing verb because FILTER
refuses in every build — a DRAW would only give 519 in a build with no window, and
the point here is the code rather than the verb.
The interpreter's own codes
These eight are akbasic's, they are absolute, and they do not move. The interpreter owns the block 512 to 767 and uses the first eight of it.
| Code | ERR() text |
What raises it |
|---|---|---|
| 512 | Syntax Error |
A line that will not parse, a verb given the wrong shape of arguments, a keyword where a value belongs, or a branch by number to a line the program did not number. The commonest code and the only one that can arrive before a statement runs. |
| 513 | Type Error |
A string where a number belongs or the reverse — LEFT(1, 2), A$ = 1 + "X" used as a number, a non-integer array subscript. |
| 514 | Undefined Reference |
A branch to a label that does not exist, or a call to a function that was never defined. A branch to a line that does not exist raises nothing at all: GOTO 500 with no line 500 walks to the end of the program and stops, which is the same answer RENUMBER gives such a branch. |
| 515 | Out Of Bounds |
An array subscript past the end, a colour index outside 1 to 16, a sprite number outside 1 to 8, a RGR or RSPRITE field number that is not a field. |
| 516 | Environment Error |
The scope pool is exhausted — 32 nested GOSUB, FOR or DEF bodies. See below: this is the one code you cannot usefully trap. |
| 517 | Value Error |
A number that is the wrong number: division by zero, a negative SCALE maximum, a string longer than 255 characters, a GSHAPE handed a string that did not come from SSHAPE. |
| 518 | State Error |
A verb run outside the structure it needs — RESUME with no handler running, NEXT with no FOR, LOOP with no DO. |
| 519 | Device Error |
A verb needs a graphics, audio, input or sprite device the runtime has not been given, or one that cannot do what was asked. Everything in Chapters 6, 7 and 8 refuses with this in a build with no window. FILTER and SYS refuse with it always. |
516 is not usefully trappable and that is inherent, not a defect. Entering a handler takes a scope, and the pool being empty is exactly what raised the error — so a program that exhausts it gets the report rather than the handler. Runaway recursion is the way to reach it, and a handler that could not run is the right answer to it.
Codes from underneath
ER# carries whatever code the failure was raised with, and not every failure comes
from the interpreter. Two other kinds reach a program.
Errors from the C library, as errno. The disk verbs open, read and delete real
files, and a real file refuses for the reasons files refuse:
10 TRAP 100
20 DOPEN 1, "nosuchfile.bas"
30 END
100 PRINT "" + ER# + " " + ERR(ER#)
110 END
2 No such file or directory
2 is ENOENT. Any errno your platform defines can arrive this way, with the text
your C library gives it — so this is the one part of the table that is your machine's
rather than this document's.
Errors from the libraries akbasic is built on. libakerror names its own codes
just above the errno range, and they surface when something fails below the language
rather than in it — SCRATCH on a file that will not delete gives its
Input Output Error, and VAL of text that is not a number gives its Value Error
rather than the interpreter's 517, because the conversion happens in libakstdlib and
the code comes back up with it. In the SDL build, libakgl owns 256 to 262 and an
SDL Error can reach ER# if the renderer itself refuses.
Do not hardcode those numbers. libakerror's codes are defined as offsets from
the largest errno your platform has, so the same code is a different integer on a
different machine — on the machine this was written on the range begins at 134, and
that is not a promise. The interpreter's own 512 to 519 are absolute and are the only
numbers worth writing into a program.
Two codes render as the same text
ERR() gives the registered name for a code, and two pairs of them collide:
| Text | Given by |
|---|---|
Type Error |
513, and libakerror's own type error |
Value Error |
517, and libakerror's own value error |
The Value Error pair is not hypothetical — it is the VAL case above:
10 TRAP 100
20 PRINT VAL("XYZ")
30 END
100 PRINT ERR(ER#)
110 IF ER# = 517 THEN PRINT "INTERPRETER"
120 IF ER# <> 517 THEN PRINT "FROM UNDERNEATH"
130 END
Value Error
FROM UNDERNEATH
So IF ERR(ER#) = "Value Error" THEN is not a reliable test and IF ER# = 517 THEN
is. Compare the code; print the text.
What is not in ER#
An error the interpreter reports about the host rather than about your program never
reaches ER#, because it is not the program's error to catch — a font that will not
open, a window that will not create. Those come out of the embedding API instead;
Chapter 14 draws that line, and Chapter 10 is what a host does with it.