8117fb564dc14cb32623610927d0e1c71e423703
8 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
8077806598
|
Take libakerror 2.0.1, and guard the exit status it fixes
2.0.0 makes the error pool and the status registry thread safe, and it is an ABI break carrying the soname to libakerror.so.2. The break is a quiet one: __akerr_last_ignored became thread-local and akerr_next_error() now returns a context that already holds a reference, so objects compiled against a 1.x header and linked against 2.x count every reference twice and never give a slot back. Nothing about that fails to link, which is exactly what a guard is for -- include/akbasic/error.h feature-tests AKERR_THREAD_SAFE instead of AKERR_FIRST_CONSUMER_STATUS, which 2.0.0 also still defines and which therefore no longer distinguishes anything. 2.0.1 is the release this band needed most. The default unhandled-error handler ended in exit(errctx->status), and a process exit status is one byte: AKBASIC_ERR_BASE is 512, and 512 truncates to 0, so an unhandled AKBASIC_ERR_SYNTAX reported success to anything watching $?. Every other code in the band came out as some unrelated error's number. akerr_exit() substitutes 125 for anything a byte cannot carry, and a probe raising AKBASIC_ERR_DEVICE through FINISH_NORETURN now exits 125 rather than 7. It was latent here rather than live -- src/main.c handles the context and returns EXIT_FAILURE, and every test with a top-level ATTEMPT carries a HANDLE_DEFAULT -- but "no caller relies on it today" is not a property a header can keep true. tests/version_check.c asserts the mapping and fails if AKBASIC_ERR_BASE ever stops truncating to zero, because that is the day this stops being about our base. Chapter 10 gains a threading section: libakerror is safe from any thread now, and this interpreter is not and has no lock anywhere in it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
|
16b38c1138
|
Generate the documentation's figures from the listings they illustrate
Chapters 6 and 8 described what a verb draws in prose. Eight figures now show it, and each one is produced by running the BASIC listing printed immediately above it -- so a picture cannot drift away from the code beside it, which is the way a screenshot goes wrong and the way nothing notices. tools/screenshot.c is a second SDL host, much smaller than the frontend: dummy video driver, software renderer, run to completion, read the target back, write a PNG. It draws no text layer on purpose, so a READY in the corner is not noise in a figure about BOX and no font has to be resolved. tools/docs_screenshots.sh reads the new screenshot=NAME fence tag straight out of the markdown. size=WxH is the second tag, and SCALE's figure uses it: the point being made is a 320x200 listing filling a larger window, which cannot be made on a 320x200 surface. Two gates, answering different questions. docs_examples fails a tagged block with no image, in both configurations, so a figure cannot be added and forgotten. docs_screenshots -- a CTest, AKGL build only -- re-renders every figure and compares byte for byte, so a listing edited without regenerating fails. Only the second catches a stale picture. The PNGs are checked in because a reader on the forge has no build tree, and docs/images/README.md says loudly that they are generated. Regenerating is never part of a build: the target is run deliberately, so a make cannot put eight binary diffs in front of whoever ran it. Drawing the BOX figure caught a defect in TODO.md itself. Deviation 16 claimed in bold that BOX fills on a negative angle while its own paragraph said the fill was filed rather than implemented. BOX cannot fill, and filled_rect is reached by no verb as a result. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
|
737fdc760f
|
Document every error code a script can see, as chapter 15
ER# held numbers nothing explained. The appendix lists the four error classes the interpreter prints, the eight codes it owns and what raises each, and the codes that reach ER# from errno, libakerror and libakgl underneath it. The table is not asserted. A program in the chapter trips seven of the eight and prints what it got, and docs_examples byte-compares the result -- so the numbers are checked rather than claimed. The eighth, 516, is not usefully trappable and the chapter says why: entering a handler takes a scope, and the pool being empty is what raised it. Two things worth a reader's attention came out of writing it. Two codes register the same ERR() text, so a program must compare the number and print the text. And VAL reports libakerror's Value Error rather than the interpreter's 517, which makes that number the platform's rather than ours -- filed as section 6 item 21, not fixed here, because deciding which libakstdlib failures to translate is a boundary question and ENOENT out of DOPEN is the counter-case. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
|
5c5bf63356
|
Draw into the whole window, not its top-left 320x200
The graphics verbs documented a coordinate transform that did not exist. With SCALE off a coordinate went straight to akgl_draw_* as a pixel address, so an 800x600 window drew a C128 listing into its corner and left the rest unused -- while the chapter said coordinates were 320x200 and stretching to fit was the host's business. akbasic_GraphicsBackend gains a size entry point, require_graphics() asks it before every verb that draws so a resized window is honoured between two statements, and 320x200 becomes the fallback for a backend that leaves it NULL. It is the record's one optional member, so a host written against the old header keeps the behaviour it had. SCALE now maps onto the device, and RGR(1)/RGR(2) report the drawing surface so a program can use a window whose size it did not choose. RGR(0) is BASIC 7.0's own field, the GRAPHIC mode. SCALE also mapped xmax onto the width rather than onto the last pixel, so SCALE 1, 319, 199 followed by DRAW 1, 319, 199 drew nothing at all -- one pixel past the surface. Fixed in the same line, because it is what makes "SCALE gives a C128 listing the whole window" true rather than nearly true. The akgl test renders against a 128x128 target, deliberately smaller than the old constants: a SCALE still dividing by them misses it entirely rather than landing somewhere plausible. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
|
23ccb66f69
|
Document the interpreter's architecture as chapter fourteen
Some checks failed
akbasic CI Build / cmake_build (push) Successful in 3m2s
akbasic CI Build / sanitizers (push) Successful in 3m50s
akbasic CI Build / coverage (push) Failing after 3m22s
akbasic CI Build / akgl_build (push) Failing after 20s
akbasic CI Build / mutation_test (push) Successful in 12m19s
Chapters 1 through 13 describe the language. Nothing described the machine that runs it, and the answers were spread across header comments, TODO.md sections written for a different purpose, and the source itself. Somebody embedding the interpreter, debugging something it did, or adding a verb had to reconstruct the shape from all three. docs/14-architecture.md is that shape, and only that: the three targets and the driver, the single akbasic_Runtime and why nothing is file-scope, akbasic_runtime_step() unrolled with the reason each stage sits where it does, the four modes and what set_mode() does beyond assigning, a line's journey from text through tokens and leaves to a verb handler, the dispatch table, the pool map with what each exhaustion actually says, environments doubling as block state, the two kinds of error, devices, and interrupts. It defers rather than restates. The headers are the authority on every function's contract and the chapter says so up front; where a rule is subtle the header comment already states it at more length than a chapter should. MAINTENANCE.md keeps the conventions and now points here for the mechanism, so there is still one copy of each. Two sections are the reason it exists at all. Debugging: reading a TRON trace as evidence about the loop rather than the lines, reading an akerror stack trace and what it is not, four breakpoints and the expressions worth printing at them, narrowing with ctest -R and the mock devices, and a symptom-to-cause table. Changing it: the verb recipe end to end including the private src/verbs.h prototype that is easy to miss, the rule that a missing dependency capability gets filed upstream rather than worked around, and the five constraints goal 3 puts on any change. A `text` fence tag comes with it. Every fenced block in docs/ is executed and an untagged one is a hard error, so six block diagrams had nowhere to live. The tag means never executed, it is counted in the skip line like `cmake`, and MAINTENANCE.md documents it -- the alternative was an indented block the extractor never sees, and a picture nobody decided about is indistinguishable from a test nobody ran. tests/docs_examples.sh now makes --root and --basic absolute before it starts. Both are used from inside a sandbox directory it cd's into, so the invocation MAINTENANCE.md itself documents -- --root . --basic ./build/basic -- failed every example with "exited 127" and every setup= with "setup failed". CTest passes absolute paths and never saw it; running one document by hand hits it immediately. Writing the error section turned up a defect and TODO.md section 8 records it. The ATTEMPT blocks that turn a script's mistake into an error line wrap parsing and interpretation but not scanning, so a line with more than 32 tokens escapes as an interpreter error: stack trace, exit 1, and at a prompt the REPL is gone. That is the same shape as section 8 item 2, on a path that fix did not cover. Not fixed here -- it is a behaviour change and wants its own tests -- but written down with the three call sites and what would cover them. Both configurations stay green: 95/95 and 94/94. docs_examples now runs 37 programs, 9 transcripts, 45 output comparisons, 3 C snippets, 2 excerpts and 2 shell blocks, and skips 9 text blocks. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
|
80b76ad467
|
Split the documentation by who reads it
Some checks failed
akbasic CI Build / cmake_build (push) Successful in 3m2s
akbasic CI Build / sanitizers (push) Successful in 3m51s
akbasic CI Build / coverage (push) Failing after 3m24s
akbasic CI Build / akgl_build (push) Failing after 20s
akbasic CI Build / mutation_test (push) Has been cancelled
README.md was 577 lines and answered four different questions at once: what
the project is, how to build it, every verb and function in the language, and
how to maintain the test harness. The verb and function lists had already been
written a second time in docs/11 and docs/12, which is how a list of that size
goes stale -- there is no way to notice the two have drifted apart.
README.md is now 150 lines and holds only what somebody evaluating the project
needs: what it is, the quickstart, why it was rewritten in C, the five rules
embedding imposes on the design, the two ways to use it, and where everything
else lives. Technical detail goes to docs/, maintenance to MAINTENANCE.md.
The akbasic_TextSink struct moved to docs/10-embedding.md rather than being
deleted. It was the corpus's only `c excerpt=` block -- the check that caught
the stale struct two commits ago -- so dropping it with the README would have
quietly retired a test. docs/10 also stopped claiming README.md carries the
full API surface and the pool limits, which the trim made false.
CLAUDE.md went from 458 lines to 62, because almost none of it was
agent-specific. The project goals, the Go reference and its architecture, the
dependency version and ABI rules, the four ways an embedded build collides,
the libakerror convention, the error-code range map and the style rules are
all things a maintainer needs, and they are now in MAINTENANCE.md with one
copy to keep true. CLAUDE.md points there and keeps only the rules no test
enforces: tests in the same commit asserting the correct contract, file a
missing dependency capability upstream, do not edit generated output or
tests/reference/, co-author your commits.
Four claims did not survive the move, having gone stale where nothing could
notice:
- "The repository is currently empty apart from its submodules -- no
commits, no source tree, no build files." There are 43 commits.
- libakgl's target_compile_definitions(akerror PUBLIC AKERR_MAX_ERR_VALUE)
at deps/libakgl/CMakeLists.txt:44, described as inert but present. It is
gone; only a historical mention in a comment remains.
- "akbasic_init() claims 512-767." There is no akbasic_init. It is
akbasic_error_register(), called from akbasic_runtime_init().
- Time-relative phrasing ("libakgl hit two of them in the last week").
Five places pointed at CLAUDE.md for the range map or the file-it-upstream
rule and now point at MAINTENANCE.md: include/akbasic/error.h,
src/runtime_disk.c and three entries in TODO.md. Both source changes are
comments. deps/libakgl/TODO.md cites it too and is left alone; it is a
submodule, and the rule it quotes is still reachable from CLAUDE.md.
ctest is green at 95 of 95, docs_examples included: 36 programs, 9
transcripts, 44 output comparisons, 3 C snippets, 1 excerpt.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
|||
|
342e4c07da
|
Execute every documented example as a test
Some checks failed
akbasic CI Build / cmake_build (push) Successful in 3m2s
akbasic CI Build / sanitizers (push) Successful in 3m52s
akbasic CI Build / coverage (push) Failing after 3m24s
akbasic CI Build / akgl_build (push) Failing after 20s
akbasic CI Build / mutation_test (push) Has been cancelled
docs/ and README.md carry 85 fenced blocks. Every one was checked by hand exactly once, when it was written, which is not a standard that survives a changing interpreter -- and four were already wrong: two transcripts showing a leading space PRINT does not emit, akbasic_TextSink in README.md missing the two members it had grown hours earlier, and FILTER's refusal quoted with wording the code does not use. tests/docs_examples.sh reads a fence-tag vocabulary and runs what it finds. BASIC programs and transcripts run and are byte-compared against an `output` block; C snippets compile with -fsyntax-only against the real include path, which CMake writes out because it is transitive through akerror, akstdlib and akgl; shell blocks run in a sandbox. Anything that would reconfigure the build tree, hit the network or re-enter the suite is tagged norun with the reason in MAINTENANCE.md, and the two cmake blocks stay hand-maintained by decision. An untagged block is a failure rather than a default, and the pass line reports what it executed by kind. Both exist because the way a harness like this dies is by quietly matching nothing and passing -- which it duly did on the first CTest run, where a generator expression evaluating to nothing still contributed an empty argument that the script read as a filename. The count is what caught it. The excerpt check earns its own mention: a block tagged `c excerpt=include/akbasic/sink.h` must still appear in that header, comments and whitespace ignored. Compiling it would only redefine the type, so a compile check could not have found the stale struct, and did not. Registered as the CTest case docs_examples in both configurations. Fixing the four wrong examples turned up two interpreter defects, fixed in the previous commit and recorded in TODO.md section 8. MAINTENANCE.md is new: the fence-tag reference, what to do when the case fails, and the conventions that until now only existed inside source comments -- the three test lists and how two of them invert "passed", the sorted verb table, that a golden file is never edited to suit this interpreter, and that a fix gets mutation-checked with a file copy rather than git checkout. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
|||
|
cdaefcc941
|
Write the usage guide as thirteen chapters in docs/
Some checks failed
akbasic CI Build / cmake_build (push) Successful in 3m0s
akbasic CI Build / sanitizers (push) Successful in 3m45s
akbasic CI Build / coverage (push) Failing after 3m22s
akbasic CI Build / akgl_build (push) Failing after 21s
akbasic CI Build / mutation_test (push) Successful in 11m26s
Organised the way the C128 Programmer's Reference Guide is: the language first, then each hardware area, then the reference sections. One markdown file per chapter. The verb and function references are generated from the interpreter's own dispatch table, with an assertion that every row is described, so they cannot drift out of step with what the program accepts. 98 verbs and 30 functions. Every example was run before it was written down, which caught three claims that were wrong: a whole FOR loop on one line prints nothing rather than looping once, MID and INSTR count from zero where a C128 counts from one, and a multi-line DEF returns a value the caller has to assign away. Chapter 13 is the list a BASIC 7.0 programmer needs -- roughly sixty documented differences, including the two known FOR defects and the fact that drawing does not survive a frame. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |